Skip to content

docs: record refactor step D5b (PR #99) and the confirmed jump_amount_corr look-ahead - #100

Merged
StackOverFlow11 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/progress-refactor-d5b
Jul 25, 2026
Merged

docs: record refactor step D5b (PR #99) and the confirmed jump_amount_corr look-ahead#100
StackOverFlow11 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/progress-refactor-d5b

Conversation

@StackOverFlow11

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Progress-doc-only PR. Records: the confirmed look-ahead in jump_amount_corr_20 (independently reproduced by two parties on different symbols and windows; the sharper cut — perturbing only bars at/after 14:51 — moves 1,363/1,363 cells, i.e. the signal sees the minute it trades in and the nine after), why no existing test caught it, and the ruling that truncating applies a standing research-side authorization while still requiring its own correctness-fix PR; the delivered evaluation contract v1.0; the two MEDIUM findings (a guard that could not guard itself, and a false view=decision claim one level up) with the general rule the second one produced — a mismatch that destroys meaning must be blocked, one that only introduces a disclosed sign-known bias must be recorded; the three premise problems now ruled on and queued, including the store's universe dependence (amendment A2, queued as D4c before C4) whose date-only gap detection is the very red line amendment A1 invoked to reject caller-side batching; and two methodology notes. Merged-PR list gains #98/#99. AGENTS.md byte-identical via cp. No code changes.

@StackOverFlow11
StackOverFlow11 merged commit 435a798 into main Jul 25, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant