Review entry for life cycle

[alexpdp7]

https://github.com/StyleGuides/WritingStyleGuide/blob/dev/en-US/L.xml#L104

We use two words "life cycle" and refer to the IBM word usage guide, which apparently has been updated underneath us to "lifecycle". I would suggest we remove the reference to the IBM guide (if we wish to keep our spelling) or remove the entry (if we wish to defer to IBM).

[dkolepp]

... and create a "vale" rule for this, because it's hard to keep track of this ... :D

…

On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 4:41 AM alexpdp7 ***@***.***> wrote: https://github.com/StyleGuides/WritingStyleGuide/blob/dev/en-US/L.xml#L104 We use two words "life cycle" and refer to the IBM word usage guide, which apparently has been updated underneath us to "lifecycle". I would suggest we remove the reference to the IBM guide (if we wish to keep our spelling) or remove the entry (if we wish to defer to IBM). — You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#224>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACNM5MPY7XQL344LFOT6OFDS3FB33ANCNFSM4WOG3ADQ> .

[daobrien]

... and create a "vale" rule for this, because it's hard to keep track of this ... :D
…
What are you basing Vale rules on? I.e., are you creating them independently or somehow linking them to the style guide? Which part is hard to keep track of?

[alexpdp7]

If you want to look at some rules we're using now, you can peek at:

https://github.com/RedHatTraining/DO250/tree/main/styles

We tend to provide a message that links to a source, like in:

https://github.com/RedHatTraining/DO250/blob/main/styles/GlsWordUsage/can.yml

, but we are certainly not 100% diligent on doing that and we should improve.

[alexpdp7]

Note that there might be some overlap between spellr and Vale, but in the specific case of hyphenation, Vale can check things that spellr/aspell, as far as I know, cannot.