Skip to content

docs(scope): align scope docs with runtime behavior - #280

Merged
jeff-r2026 merged 1 commit into
Tencent:mainfrom
GaoSSR:docs/scope-isolation-docs
Aug 5, 2026
Merged

docs(scope): align scope docs with runtime behavior#280
jeff-r2026 merged 1 commit into
Tencent:mainfrom
GaoSSR:docs/scope-isolation-docs

Conversation

@GaoSSR

@GaoSSR GaoSSR commented Aug 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

Align the English and Chinese scope documentation with the runtime behavior introduced by #73. When the current working directory contains a project-scope config, pull and recall use that scope only; otherwise they use the user scope.

Type of Change

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change that fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change that adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature causing existing behavior to change)
  • Documentation only
  • Refactor / internal cleanup

Test Plan

  • npx tsc --noEmit passes
  • npx vitest run passes (144 files, 1891 tests)
  • git diff --check passes
  • Added/updated tests for the change (not applicable; documentation only)

Related Issues

Refs #73 and #77.

Notes for Reviewers

This PR changes documentation only. The existing project-scope isolation behavior remains unchanged.

The documentation still described pull and recall as merging user and project scopes after project isolation became the default behavior.

Document the active-scope selection used by pull and recall, while clarifying that both configurations may coexist on one machine.

Refs Tencent#73
@GaoSSR
GaoSSR marked this pull request as ready for review August 4, 2026 12:57
@jeff-r2026
jeff-r2026 merged commit a370b3d into Tencent:main Aug 5, 2026
7 checks passed
GaoSSR added a commit to GaoSSR/teamai-cli that referenced this pull request Aug 5, 2026
Resolve the documentation overlap after Tencent#280 was squash-merged while preserving the opt-in inheritance behavior on this branch.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants