[DO NOT REVIEW] orfs: bump, fix invalid start points for paths#7722
[DO NOT REVIEW] orfs: bump, fix invalid start points for paths#7722oharboe wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
|
clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍" |
|
Weird, passed locally. I'm merging with master and pushing again in case I'm confused... |
|
clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍" |
|
@maliberty Any ideas? On the server pr-head, I get: Locally: In How can the result be different locally and on the server? To find out where it diverges, I'd need to have the logs from the server. I would have preferred an early failure in Bazel and that archives were made available immediately, in this case, now I have to wait for all other tests to run(so 2 hours). Tried on my workstation instead of my laptop, it has many more cores: |
|
Hmm.... still passes.... |
|
@vvbandeira Could you provide the logs for the failing tests? Thanks! |
|
clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍" |
1 similar comment
|
clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍" |
|
@maliberty Need some better tools to chase down the divergence in results The-OpenROAD-Project/OpenROAD-flow-scripts#3294 |
f71af45 to
777bcee
Compare
|
clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍" |
777bcee to
3a53bd9
Compare
|
clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍" |
Signed-off-by: Øyvind Harboe <oyvind.harboe@zylin.com>
3a53bd9 to
6326324
Compare
|
clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍" |
|
@maliberty @gadfort Closing this PR to keep it unchanged as it is part of the information that goes into #7746 |
No description provided.