Introduce the examples from Norway & change Covered from boolean to enumeration

[skinkie]

Fix #682

[skinkie]

@ue71603 want to discuss tomorrow or merge

[ue71603]

@skinkie if we get a go from ENTUR, then i would say merge.

[ue71603]

@skinkie if ok for you, then merge.

[skinkie]

I recall @trurlurl mentioned we needed to add true / false. I don't know why it is not in this one.

[ue71603]

@skinkie I think we discussed it. However, it is not in here. So where do we go... multiple booleans? enumeration ? list? @trurlurl

[trurlurl]

@skinkie I think we discussed it. However, it is not in here. So where do we go... multiple booleans? enumeration ? list? @trurlurl

The idea was to add "True" and "False" to CoveredEnumeration.

[ue71603]

@skinkie I think we discussed it. However, it is not in here. So where do we go... multiple booleans? enumeration ? list? @trurlurl

The idea was to add "True" and "False" to CoveredEnumeration.

added now

[skinkie]

The strange thing is: I recall I added it.

[trurlurl]

The strange thing is: I recall I added it.

That's not so strange. When planning and starting to do something, the projected imagination of having achieved the goal may remain as persistent memory if the execution of the action sequence and the accompanying attentional processes has been completely interrupted and abandoned because of some external event. What remains is a false memory of having achieved the goal. At least, that's a theory how things work that I recall having either found or elaborated myself - but strangely I don't remember any more details about it...

[skinkie]

The strange thing is: I recall I added it.

That's not so strange. When planning and starting to do something, the projected imagination of having achieved the goal may remain as persistent memory if the execution of the action sequence and the accompanying attentional processes has been completely interrupted and abandoned because of some external event. What remains is a false memory of having achieved the goal. At least, that's a theory how things work that I recall having either found or elaborated myself - but strangely I don't remember any more details about it...

Lets put it this way, when you mentioned it in the last working group. I directly did it. So I wonder where it ended up.

[ue71603]

perhaps it was undone by #681?

[skinkie]

I am not crazy.

cd00ea6

[trurlurl]

I am not crazy.

cd00ea6

@skinkie I don't think anybody ever suspected you being crazy (except perhaps yourself) - I would rather have thought that another theoretical explanation would have applied in that case: that it was the universe who simply forgot the change you had done.