Skip to content

docs: record E574 slot-loss null result#542

Merged
Tyler-R-Kendrick merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
agent/e574-e569-slotloss2
Jul 20, 2026
Merged

docs: record E574 slot-loss null result#542
Tyler-R-Kendrick merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
agent/e574-e569-slotloss2

Conversation

@Tyler-R-Kendrick

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

  • record the capped E574 slot-component-loss treatment and exact null result versus E573
  • retain the scratch checkpoint locally with explicit no-sync/non-ship status
  • add committed-run and checkpoint-roster persistence coverage for the deployed control plane

Verification

  • 48-step train completed in 76.23s with max_wall_minutes=3 and 170s process cap
  • focused persistence test passed
  • full control-plane test module passed (92 tests)
  • version stamps and repository policy passed
  • git diff --check passed

@vercel

vercel Bot commented Jul 20, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
slm-training Ready Ready Preview, Comment Jul 20, 2026 3:41am

Request Review

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 20, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

@Tyler-R-Kendrick, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 14 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 02260c7c-d014-4c28-817e-4473e0be1d37

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 685a506 and e057277.

📒 Files selected for processing (7)
  • README.md
  • docs/MODEL_CARD.md
  • docs/design/checkpoint-bucket.md
  • docs/design/iter-e574-e569-slotloss2-20260720.json
  • docs/design/iter-e574-e569-slotloss2-20260720.md
  • docs/design/quality-experiment-matrix.md
  • tests/test_web/test_control_plane.py
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch agent/e574-e569-slotloss2

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@Tyler-R-Kendrick
Tyler-R-Kendrick merged commit 0095ddb into main Jul 20, 2026
5 checks passed
@Tyler-R-Kendrick
Tyler-R-Kendrick deleted the agent/e574-e569-slotloss2 branch July 20, 2026 03:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant