Since .to_raster()1 doesn't expose any options, it seems that currently the only way to make it try harder and produce a sharper image (assuming you have high-resolution data) is to set the figure DPI to something higher than the default (100) before calling .to_raster(). This is a bit annoying if you're using Jupyter though, because unless you reset the figure DPI to the default afterwards, it will display the figure blown up.
Anyway, I feel like this method should at least be mentioned in https://uxarray.readthedocs.io/en/latest/user-guide/mpl.html#rasterization. And/or option(s) could be added to .to_raster().
Originally posted by @zmoon in #1353
Since
.to_raster()1 doesn't expose any options, it seems that currently the only way to make it try harder and produce a sharper image (assuming you have high-resolution data) is to set the figure DPI to something higher than the default (100) before calling.to_raster(). This is a bit annoying if you're using Jupyter though, because unless you reset the figure DPI to the default afterwards, it will display the figure blown up.Anyway, I feel like this method should at least be mentioned in https://uxarray.readthedocs.io/en/latest/user-guide/mpl.html#rasterization. And/or option(s) could be added to
.to_raster().Originally posted by @zmoon in #1353
Footnotes
thanks for adding this, have been enjoying it ↩