Skip to content

docs: point llamaindex model lists to uipath list-models#356

Merged
radu-mocanu merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/llamaindex-list-models
Jun 17, 2026
Merged

docs: point llamaindex model lists to uipath list-models#356
radu-mocanu merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/llamaindex-list-models

Conversation

@radu-mocanu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Summary

  • replace the outdated, hardcoded model lists in the llamaindex LLMs and embeddings docs with an "Available models" section that runs uipath list-models (shows the models actually available on the user's tenant) and notes they are subject to AI Trust Layer policies
  • align the intro and the model table format with the langchain chat models docs

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings June 17, 2026 09:04
@sonarqubecloud

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Updates the uipath-llamaindex “LLMs and Embeddings” documentation to avoid hardcoded provider model lists by pointing users to uipath list-models, which reflects the models enabled on their tenant (and governed by AI Trust Layer policies).

Changes:

  • Adds an “Available models” section that demonstrates uipath list-models output and shows how to pass model IDs into provider-specific classes.
  • Replaces hardcoded OpenAI / Bedrock / Vertex model lists with references to the uipath list-models output columns.
  • Aligns wording/structure around model selection across the provider sections.

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Comment thread packages/uipath-llamaindex/docs/llms_and_embeddings.md
Comment thread packages/uipath-llamaindex/docs/llms_and_embeddings.md
Comment thread packages/uipath-llamaindex/docs/llms_and_embeddings.md
@radu-mocanu radu-mocanu merged commit a6550c3 into main Jun 17, 2026
65 of 70 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants