INTL-1685: improve failure message

[dustinlessard-wf]

Motivation

When engineers see a CI check failure, they are not provided any indication of next steps.

1 change(s) needed.

Changes

• modified failure message to include instructions on how to run the INTLcodemod locally

Release Notes

modify failure message to include instructions on how to run the INTL codemod locally

Review

See CONTRIBUTING.md for more details on review types (+1 / QA +1 / +10) and code review process.

Please review:

QA Checklist

• Tests were updated and provide good coverage of the changeset and other affected code
• Manual testing was performed if needed
  • Steps from PR author:
  • Anything falling under manual testing criteria outlined in CONTRIBUTING.md

Merge Checklist

While we perform many automated checks before auto-merging, some manual checks are needed:

• A Frontend Frameworks Design member has reviewed these changes
• There are no unaddressed comments - this check can be automated if reviewers use the "Request Changes" feature
• For release PRs - Version metadata in Rosie comment is correct

[aviary-wf]

Security Insights

No security relevant content was detected by automated scans.

Action Items

• Review PR for security impact; comment "security review required" if needed or unsure
• Verify aviary.yaml coverage of security relevant code

---

Questions or Comments? Reach out on Slack: #support-infosec.

[alanknight-wk]

@Workiva/release-management-p

[dustinlessard-wf]

QA+1

[rmconsole-wf]

+1 from RM