Skip to content

[Snyk] Upgrade truffle-privatekey-provider from 1.3.0 to 1.5.0#31

Open
snyk-bot wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
snyk-upgrade-3ffecb041bbe3619a1366fcee425194d
Open

[Snyk] Upgrade truffle-privatekey-provider from 1.3.0 to 1.5.0#31
snyk-bot wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
snyk-upgrade-3ffecb041bbe3619a1366fcee425194d

Conversation

@snyk-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Snyk has created this PR to upgrade truffle-privatekey-provider from 1.3.0 to 1.5.0.

merge advice
ℹ️ Keep your dependencies up-to-date. This makes it easier to fix existing vulnerabilities and to more quickly identify and fix newly disclosed vulnerabilities when they affect your project.


  • The recommended version is 2 versions ahead of your current version.
  • The recommended version was released 2 years ago, on 2020-09-02.

The recommended version fixes:

Severity Issue PriorityScore (*) Exploit Maturity
Prototype Pollution
SNYK-JS-ASYNC-2441827
482/1000
Why? Proof of Concept exploit, CVSS 7.5
Proof of Concept
Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS)
SNYK-JS-BROWSERSLIST-1090194
482/1000
Why? Proof of Concept exploit, CVSS 7.5
Proof of Concept
Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS)
SNYK-JS-BROWSERSLIST-1090194
482/1000
Why? Proof of Concept exploit, CVSS 7.5
Proof of Concept

(*) Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.

Release notes
Package name: truffle-privatekey-provider
  • 1.5.0 - 2020-09-02

    1.5.0

  • 1.4.0 - 2020-09-02

    1.4.0

  • 1.3.0 - 2019-06-21

    Fixed Error: Web3ProviderEngine does not support synchronous requests. #7 (use another version of web3-provider-engine).

from truffle-privatekey-provider GitHub release notes
Commit messages
Package name: truffle-privatekey-provider

Compare


Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open upgrade PRs.

For more information:

🧐 View latest project report

🛠 Adjust upgrade PR settings

🔕 Ignore this dependency or unsubscribe from future upgrade PRs

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant