Skip to content

Conversation

@larshp
Copy link
Collaborator

@larshp larshp commented May 21, 2025

so it works better with the downport

as it moves the table read to before the IF

not tested, but looked at it for some time, I think the logic is identical

@larshp larshp requested a review from Copilot May 21, 2025 10:36
Copy link

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR refactors a conditional block to adjust the table read order and updates the linting configuration.

  • Refactored the complex condition into nested IFs for separating the candidate evaluations.
  • Increased the allowed nesting depth in abaplint.json from 5 to 8.

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

File Description
src/zcl_diff3.clas.abap Refactored conditional structure to simplify exit logic.
abaplint.json Increased the linting nesting depth to support deeper logic.
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (2)

src/zcl_diff3.clas.abap:701

  • The restructured nested IF conditions improve clarity, but please verify that the new structure behaves identically to the original combined condition. Adding an inline comment to explain the intended logic may help future maintenance.
IF lt_candidates[ key = lv_s ]-buffer2index < lv_j.

abaplint.json:444

  • [nitpick] Increasing the allowed nesting depth from 5 to 8 permits deeper nesting; please confirm that this configuration change is deliberate and supported by the codebase's complexity requirements.
"depth": 8,

@larshp larshp marked this pull request as ready for review May 21, 2025 10:38
@mbtools mbtools merged commit ab966b7 into main May 21, 2025
5 checks passed
@mbtools mbtools deleted the hvam/refactor22105 branch May 21, 2025 10:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants