Do you mean email#87
Conversation
|
FYI I've fixed a couple of things on the branch (removed an added top-level package.json that isn't necessary, moved the added breaks to the Volunteer section, added breaks for WCAG 3). I forget what exactly the real case this was inspired by did, but do you think this would be slightly more realistic/plausible if it waited until at least "@" or "@" followed by anything is present before complaining, rather than right away? (If so, I can make the adjustment) |
|
Thanks for fixing things. I've just gone back to the ecommerce form that does this thing and they actually pop that message up when the email address text field is moved out of. That would be a little better for this, I think. |
Can you test whether it happens any time it loses focus, regardless of how much or little is input? (i.e. if the user hasn't even gotten to the "@" part yet) I do wonder how cases this specific fare in audits in general - i.e. it seems easy to miss |
|
Update: during yesterday's meeting we decided to switch this to |
Adds a "did you mean [this email provider]" prompt in the volunteer sign up form. Updates list of issues.