Merged
Conversation
ladyada
approved these changes
Feb 3, 2025
adafruit-adabot
added a commit
to adafruit/Adafruit_CircuitPython_Bundle
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 4, 2025
Updating https://github.com/adafruit/Adafruit_CircuitPython_AHTx0 to 1.0.25 from 1.0.24: > Merge pull request adafruit/Adafruit_CircuitPython_AHTx0#23 from jposada202020/main Updating https://github.com/adafruit/Adafruit_CircuitPython_BH1750 to 1.1.14 from 1.1.13: > Merge pull request adafruit/Adafruit_CircuitPython_BH1750#12 from jposada202020/adding-displayio_example Updating https://github.com/adafruit/Adafruit_CircuitPython_DPS310 to 2.1.17 from 2.1.16: > Merge pull request adafruit/Adafruit_CircuitPython_DPS310#30 from jposada202020/adding_displayio_example Updating https://github.com/adafruit/Adafruit_CircuitPython_HX711 to 1.0.5 from 1.0.4: > Merge pull request adafruit/Adafruit_CircuitPython_HX711#5 from FoamyGuy/revert_longint Updating https://github.com/adafruit/Adafruit_CircuitPython_LIS2MDL to 2.1.25 from 2.1.24: > Merge pull request adafruit/Adafruit_CircuitPython_LIS2MDL#19 from jposada202020/adding_displayio_example Updating https://github.com/adafruit/Adafruit_CircuitPython_LTR390 to 1.1.19 from 1.1.18: > Merge pull request adafruit/Adafruit_CircuitPython_LTR390#18 from jposada202020/adding_displayio_example Updating https://github.com/adafruit/Adafruit_CircuitPython_MPL115A2 to 1.1.20 from 1.1.19: > Merge pull request adafruit/Adafruit_CircuitPython_MPL115A2#16 from jposada202020/adding_displayio_example Updating https://github.com/adafruit/Adafruit_CircuitPython_MPL3115A2 to 3.0.7 from 3.0.6: > Merge pull request adafruit/Adafruit_CircuitPython_MPL3115A2#33 from jposada202020/adding_displayio_example Updating https://github.com/adafruit/Adafruit_CircuitPython_MPU6050 to 1.3.2 from 1.3.1: > Merge pull request adafruit/Adafruit_CircuitPython_MPU6050#41 from jposada202020/adding_displayio_example Updating https://github.com/adafruit/Adafruit_CircuitPython_MSA301 to 1.3.8 from 1.3.7: > Merge pull request adafruit/Adafruit_CircuitPython_MSA301#22 from jposada202020/adding_displayio_example Updating https://github.com/adafruit/Adafruit_CircuitPython_TM to 1.1.15 from 1.1.14: > Merge pull request adafruit/Adafruit_CircuitPython_TM#18 from jposada202020/adding_displayio_example
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
@ladyada
Resolves: #4
Reverting the change from #3. I think that I didn't have this wired up correctly when I tested the PR, or else the gauge I was trying to use is wrong or broken.
I got a new https://www.adafruit.com/product/4541 and have set it up with the HX711 for testing today. This time around I do get values that differ from the the Arduino library. Right now I get 3 different values respectively from:
It's not clear to me which of those different values is the correct / expected one, I don't think I could get to the bottom it very quickly, so I've opted to revert the change from #3 for now.
I found this code in the 3rd party driver which was linked in the original issue: https://github.com/fivesixzero/CircuitPython_HX711/blob/4efc13f5e69f482d9b43936077e19e5fbeb7f285/hx711/hx711_gpio.py#L72-L74 which is similar to the changes made in #3 but it uses greater than instead of
&bitwise in the if statement.In the longer term perhaps it's worth comparing the implementation in this library with the one from https://github.com/fivesixzero/CircuitPython_HX711/tree/main to see what differences exist and determine if we can use the approach from that library if it does indeed allow for supporting non-long int builds. For me, this would require a deeper dive into the datasheet and perhaps the arduino library to try to understand which values are the expected ones.