Skip to content

Remove references of "airflow.www" in FAB provider#46914

Merged
vincbeck merged 1 commit into
apache:mainfrom
aws-mwaa:vincbeck/fab-www
Feb 20, 2025
Merged

Remove references of "airflow.www" in FAB provider#46914
vincbeck merged 1 commit into
apache:mainfrom
aws-mwaa:vincbeck/fab-www

Conversation

@vincbeck

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The old UI is getting removed in #46871. Some tests are failing because airflow.www is being used in FAB provider and it should not. Remove these references.


^ Add meaningful description above
Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information.
In case of fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
In case of a new dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
In case of backwards incompatible changes please leave a note in a newsfragment file, named {pr_number}.significant.rst or {issue_number}.significant.rst, in newsfragments.

@bugraoz93

bugraoz93 commented Feb 20, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Great cleaning! Should we include this part in this PR or another one?

# TODO: change to "/fab/v1" when legacy UI is gone

Edit:
There is one more :)

Can be deleted once the Airflow 2 legacy UI is removed.

@jedcunningham

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

My 2c, a follow up for those would be better.

@bugraoz93

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Great, make sense! Was just wondering your ideas. Thanks! :)

@vincbeck

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

My 2c, a follow up for those would be better.

Agree, I'd like to do it once the UI is removed, which is not done yet :)

@vincbeck vincbeck force-pushed the vincbeck/fab-www branch 5 times, most recently from 9f1fec2 to f0cb48b Compare February 20, 2025 19:08
@vincbeck vincbeck force-pushed the vincbeck/fab-www branch 2 times, most recently from a861500 to ce7685b Compare February 20, 2025 20:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants