Skip to content

fix: Re-add configuring orm for OpenLineage's listener on scheduler #48049

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
mobuchowski merged 1 commit into from
Mar 21, 2025
Merged

fix: Re-add configuring orm for OpenLineage's listener on scheduler #48049

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
7 changes: 4 additions & 3 deletions providers/openlineage/src/airflow/providers/openlineage/plugins/listener.py
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -69,15 +69,16 @@ def _get_try_number_success(val):

def _executor_initializer():
"""
Initialize worker processes for the executor used for DagRun listener.
Initialize processes for the executor used with DAGRun listener's methods (on scheduler).

This function must be picklable, so it cannot be defined as an inner method or local function.

Reconfigures the ORM engine to prevent issues that arise when multiple processes interact with
the Airflow database.
"""
if not AIRFLOW_V_3_0_PLUS:
settings.configure_orm()
# This initializer is used only on the scheduler
# We can configure_orm regardless of the Airflow version, as DB access is always allowed from scheduler.
settings.configure_orm()

@kaxil kaxil Mar 21, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@ashb Wasn't this causing workers to fail too?

@kaxil kaxil Mar 21, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I see the following error in @ashb 's PR:

/usr/local/lib/python3.12/site-packages/airflow/providers/openlineage/plugins/listener.py:244 in on_task_instance_success
/usr/local/lib/python3.12/site-packages/airflow/providers/openlineage/plugins/listener.py:326 in _on_task_instance_success
/usr/local/lib/python3.12/site-packages/airflow/providers/openlineage/plugins/listener.py:452 in _execute
/usr/local/lib/python3.12/site-packages/airflow/providers/openlineage/plugins/listener.py:484 in _fork_execute
/usr/local/lib/python3.12/site-packages/airflow/settings.py:363 in configure_orm
<string>:2 in create_engine
/usr/local/lib/python3.12/site-packages/sqlalchemy/util/deprecations.py:375 in warned
/usr/local/lib/python3.12/site-packages/sqlalchemy/engine/create.py:514 in create_engine
/usr/local/lib/python3.12/site-packages/sqlalchemy/engine/url.py:738 in make_url
/usr/local/lib/python3.12/site-packages/sqlalchemy/engine/url.py:799 in _parse_url

@kaxil kaxil Mar 21, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

aah there were two instances of settings.configure_orm(), ok 👍

in _fork_execute & _executor_initializer

@mobuchowski mobuchowski Mar 21, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

exactly, the DAG level events follow different path - now even more with task sdk

@mobuchowski mobuchowski Mar 21, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@kacpermuda maybe splitting those logically into two listeners now would be a good idea? Those won't share as much logic now. Maybe after Airflow 2 goes out of provider scope?

@kaxil kaxil Mar 21, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@kacpermuda maybe splitting those logically into two listeners now would be a good idea? Those won't share as much logic now. Maybe after Airflow 2 goes out of provider scope?

Yeah, I like that idea



class OpenLineageListener:
Expand Down