Upgrade to Netty 4.1.31 and use individual dependencies#1784
Conversation
| </dependency> | ||
| <dependency> | ||
| <groupId>io.netty</groupId> | ||
| <artifactId>netty-codec-socks</artifactId> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is already being pulled by other dependencies (eg: finagle, etc..). Here, I'm not adding a new dependency, just pinning all the artifacts to be on the same version.
| </dependency> | ||
| <dependency> | ||
| <groupId>io.netty</groupId> | ||
| <artifactId>netty-handler-proxy</artifactId> |
|
run integration tests |
ivankelly
left a comment
ivankelly
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
lgtm, one question about the transports
| - lib/io.netty-netty-handler-proxy-4.1.31.Final.jar | ||
| - lib/io.netty-netty-resolver-4.1.31.Final.jar | ||
| - lib/io.netty-netty-resolver-dns-4.1.31.Final.jar | ||
| - lib/io.netty-netty-tcnative-boringssl-static-2.0.19.Final.jar |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Is this packaged as part of -all? I seem to recall transports were separate projects.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
That one (the static ssl lib) is not part of -all
There was a problem hiding this comment.
netty-tcnative-boringssl-static was already included as a dependency. I have upgrade from 2.0.7.Final to 2.0.19.Final since it's needed by the new Netty version
|
run integration tests |
|
@eolivelli can you please check again? |
eolivelli
left a comment
eolivelli
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
#shipit
I am preparing 4.8.1.
Do you want to cherry pick?
|
@eolivelli I think it's good to keep it for 4.9.0. The dependency change (from all to individuals) might surprise users in a patch release. Also, there's no specific bug that was fixed in Netty-4.1.31 that we need to make available. |
|
@merlimat okay. |
4 participants
Motivation
Upgrade to latest Netty version which brings in perf improvements and some new features (eg: Added option to do busy-wait on epoll netty/netty#8267)
Broke down the dependencies from
netty-allinto individual components, as discussed at Configure Netty allocator in bookie and client #1755 (comment)