UI: Removed redundant IP Address Column#8275
Conversation
|
code looks good, but I am not sure if an operator wouldn´t want to see the ip during configuration of the pf rules. If it is not available though , ... It seems strange and may be a bug. |
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #8275 +/- ##
=============================================
+ Coverage 12.93% 27.05% +14.12%
- Complexity 8944 28472 +19528
=============================================
Files 2715 5193 +2478
Lines 256107 366322 +110215
Branches 39938 53558 +13620
=============================================
+ Hits 33139 99125 +65986
- Misses 218808 253346 +34538
- Partials 4160 13851 +9691
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
the IP is displayed when a VM is choosed. |
|
@DaanHoogland a Jenkins job has been kicked to build UI QA env. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
|
UI build: ✔️ |
DaanHoogland
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
checked in qa
clgtm
|
@weizhouapache @OlegChuev should this go on the 4.18 branch? |
yep, sorry, I missed it. I'll change the target branch |
|
@DaanHoogland a Jenkins job has been kicked to build UI QA env. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
|
merging based on 2 approvals and manual testing result |
* 4.18: server: Initial new vpnuser state (apache#8268) UI: Removed redundant IP Address Column when create Port forwarding rules (apache#8275) UI: Removed ICMP input fields for protocol number from ACL List rules modal (apache#8253) server: check if there are active nics before network GC (apache#8204)
Description
This PR removes redundant IP Address column
Link to the issue: #8273
Types of changes
Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity
Feature/Enhancement Scale
Bug Severity
Screenshots (if appropriate):
Before fix:

After fix:

How Has This Been Tested?
How did you try to break this feature and the system with this change?