Skip to content

chore: Update depcheck toolchain and dependencies - #24289

Merged
alamb merged 1 commit into
apache:mainfrom
neilconway:neilc/chore-depcheck-update-deps
Aug 12, 2026
Merged

chore: Update depcheck toolchain and dependencies#24289
alamb merged 1 commit into
apache:mainfrom
neilconway:neilc/chore-depcheck-update-deps

Conversation

@neilconway

@neilconway neilconway commented Aug 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Which issue does this PR close?

  • N/A

Rationale for this change

dev/depcheck is scanned by Dependabot but is not eligible to receive dependabot PRs, so it has several dependencies with known security issues. This PR updates those dependencies; it also updates the Rust toolchain version used by depcheck while we're at it.

What changes are included in this PR?

See above.

Are these changes tested?

Yes. Manually tested by adding a cycle and verifying that depcheck still catches it.

Are there any user-facing changes?

No.

dev/depcheck is scanned by Dependabot but is not eligible to receive
dependabot PRs, so it has several dependencies with known security
issues. This PR updates those dependencies; it also updates the Rust
toolchain and cargo versions while we're at it.
@github-actions github-actions Bot added the development-process Related to development process of DataFusion label Aug 12, 2026
@codecov-commenter

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 81.29%. Comparing base (9b3b518) to head (6dd0290).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #24289      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   81.29%   81.29%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        1110     1110              
  Lines      385336   385336              
  Branches   385336   385336              
==========================================
- Hits       313261   313252       -9     
- Misses      53594    53596       +2     
- Partials    18481    18488       +7     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@alamb alamb left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you @neilconway

@alamb
alamb added this pull request to the merge queue Aug 12, 2026
Merged via the queue into apache:main with commit 6459afe Aug 12, 2026
39 checks passed
sandeshkr419 pushed a commit to sandeshkr419/datafusion that referenced this pull request Aug 12, 2026
## Which issue does this PR close?

- N/A

## Rationale for this change

This PR tweaks the dependabot config to send dependency updates for a
few parts of the repo that were previously missed:

- `dev/depcheck` is excluded from the Cargo workspace and has its own
`Cargo.lock` (apache#24289 updates the dependencies manually as an interim
fix)
- `datafusion/wasmtest/datafusion-wasm-app` has its own npm
`package-lock.json`
- Composite actions under `.github/actions/`
- The Python dependencies are a uv workspace rooted at the top-level
`pyproject.toml` with a shared `uv.lock`, but only `docs/` was covered —
`dev/` and `benchmarks/` got no version updates.

## What changes are included in this PR?

- Add a `cargo` entry for `/dev/depcheck`
- Add an `npm` entry for `/datafusion/wasmtest/datafusion-wasm-app`
- Change the `github-actions` entry from `directory: "/"` to
`directories: ["/", "/.github/actions/*"]` so composite actions are
covered
- Replace the `pip` `/docs` entry with a `uv` entry at the repository
root, covering the whole uv workspace and `uv.lock`

## Are these changes tested?

Some manual testing, hard to really test exhaustively without letting
dependabot run.

## Are there any user-facing changes?

No.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

development-process Related to development process of DataFusion

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants