Add partition_aware to UnionExec display#6013
Closed
alamb wants to merge 1 commit into
Closed
Conversation
Contributor
Author
|
https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/pull/6045/files removed this field so there is no need for this PR anymore |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Draft as it is clear we don't have plan coverage for this feature. See #6009 (comment)
Which issue does this PR close?
Related to #5970
Rationale for this change
As noted by @mingmwang and @crepereum on #6009, #6009 (comment) there is no good way at the moment to tell if a
UnionExecis "partition aware" and thus it is not clear to me if this mode is ever used.What changes are included in this PR?
Thus this PR improves the display plan to include information about partition in the display of the UnionExec.
Are these changes tested?
Covered by existing tests
Are there any user-facing changes?