oot ci build test#3185
Conversation
|
@xiaoxiang781216 should i also add the same stage to the github action in the app? I feel like there is not need, but the build.yml seems to closesly mirror the build.yml from the nuttx repo |
cederom
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thank you @trns1997 :-) Please take a look at [1] [2] [3] and update git commit message and PR description to match requirements :-)
[1] https://github.com/apache/nuttx/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md
[2] https://nuttx.apache.org/docs/latest/contributing/index.html
[3] https://nuttx.apache.org/docs/latest/contributing/coding_style.html
ce49756 to
c6822ff
Compare
|
@trns1997 you need fix ci error first |
c6822ff to
307e079
Compare
is there a mechanism to add this example folder in an ignore list? |
@xiaoxiang781216 3 options. Either i place this |
217ca6d to
f9fbcaa
Compare
Add the source content for the out-of-tree build test under `apps/testing/cxx-oot-build`. This supports the new CI check in NuttX to prevent regressions in the `make export` workflow. The test project provides: * Sample OOT build structure. * Integration with exported `nuttx-export`. * Verification of successful build and link. Signed-off-by: trns1997 <trns1997@gmail.com>
f9fbcaa to
f137327
Compare
|
@xiaoxiang781216 do we want to add the stage from https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/17017/files to the |
This solution seems to be the best: add an optional argument to |
ah @raiden00pl, i already implemented the guard approach. But i do not mind creating this feature in another PR. I do not want to mix this test with this feature. If you do not mind can you create the issue and assign it to me? |
Note: Please adhere to Contributing Guidelines.
Summary
Issue: #17016
Depends-on: apache/nuttx#17017
Impact
Testing