Skip to content

CI: Increase CI Jobs to 100% for Complex PRs#15460

Merged
xiaoxiang781216 merged 1 commit into
apache:masterfrom
lupyuen2:increase-ci-jobs
Jan 8, 2025
Merged

CI: Increase CI Jobs to 100% for Complex PRs#15460
xiaoxiang781216 merged 1 commit into
apache:masterfrom
lupyuen2:increase-ci-jobs

Conversation

@lupyuen

@lupyuen lupyuen commented Jan 8, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary

This PR increases the CI Jobs for Complex PRs from 50% to 100%, as explained here:

Impact

By increasing the CI Checks, we will have better quality PRs that won't fail the Daily Builds.

Complex PRs will now complete CI Checks in 2 hours 10 mins. (Instead of 1.5 hours previously)

No impact on Simple PRs that affect only One Single Architecture (arm32, risc-v, etc).

Testing

Complex PRs will now execute 100% of CI Jobs:

Simple PRs (Arm32) are not affected:

This PR increases the CI Jobs for Complex PRs from 50% to 100%, as explained here:
- apache#15451 (comment)
@github-actions github-actions Bot added Area: CI Size: S The size of the change in this PR is small labels Jan 8, 2025
@nuttxpr

nuttxpr commented Jan 8, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

[Experimental Bot, please feedback here]

Yes, this PR appears to meet the NuttX requirements. The summary clearly explains the "why" and the "how" of the change, referencing the relevant issue. The impact section details the effects on build time (increased for complex PRs) and clarifies the lack of impact on simple PRs. The testing section provides links to CI runs demonstrating the change's behavior, effectively covering both complex and simple PR scenarios. While it doesn't include "before/after" logs in the specific format requested, the links to CI runs serve the same purpose, showing the results of the change in a verifiable way. The impact on users, hardware, documentation, security, and compatibility are all implicitly or explicitly addressed as having no impact.

@xiaoxiang781216 xiaoxiang781216 merged commit cd83dc1 into apache:master Jan 8, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Area: CI Size: S The size of the change in this PR is small

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[BUG] at32f437-mini/systemview: builds fail with error: implicit declaration of function 'SEGGER_RTT_LOCK'

3 participants