Make client-admin-api to use interfaces with builders instead of POJOs - #10818
Conversation
merlimat
added
the
type/enhancement
f7421f5 to
9d0172d
Compare
|
Hi @merlimat thanks for your contribution. For this PR, do we need to update docs? |
9d0172d to
4ea3d37
Compare
|
/pulsarbot run-failure-checks |
|
/pulsarbot run-failure-checks |
| } | ||
|
|
||
| static Builder builder() { | ||
| return ReflectionUtils.newBuilder("org.apache.pulsar.common.policies.data.TenantInfoImpl"); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Whether should we put rg.apache.pulsar.common.policies.data.TenantInfoImpl into pulsar-client-admin-api module instead of pulsar-common?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The reason for it is the presence of Swagger annotations which cannot be put as dependency of the pulsar-client-admin-api module.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We should make sure to use pulsar-client-admin-api dependent project must include pulsar-common dependency. Otherwise, it will throw no such class exception
There was a problem hiding this comment.
That's correct. You won't use pulsar-client-admin-api directly, but through pulsar-client-admin which is a shaded package, or in the context of functions, the -api module will be exposed to the function while the pulsar-client-admin will be kept in the framework class loader.
### Motivation apache/pulsar#10818 and apache/pulsar#10774 introduced API changes to `ClusterDataImpl` and `TenantInfoImpl`. ### Modifications - Fix current code for new interface. - Remove unused setup code.
apache#10818) ### Motivation Instead of using POJOs types in the Java client-admin API, use interfaces ### Modifications * Converted more POJOs into interfaces * Added builders to construct instances of the interfaces without directly using the implementation classes Note: for easier reviewing, there are 2 commits in this PR: * apache@f14ce73 includes the changes to production code * apache@23b6f74 changes to the unit tests
apache#10818) ### Motivation Instead of using POJOs types in the Java client-admin API, use interfaces ### Modifications * Converted more POJOs into interfaces * Added builders to construct instances of the interfaces without directly using the implementation classes Note: for easier reviewing, there are 2 commits in this PR: * apache@f14ce73 includes the changes to production code * apache@23b6f74 changes to the unit tests
4 participants
Motivation
Instead of using POJOs types in the Java client-admin API, use interfaces
Modifications
Note: for easier reviewing, there are 2 commits in this PR: