Fixed using CommandSubscribe.getConsumerName() without checking#11199
Merged
Conversation
sijie
approved these changes
Jul 2, 2021
eolivelli
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 5, 2021
(cherry picked from commit 707cb1a)
bharanic-dev
pushed a commit
to bharanic-dev/pulsar
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 18, 2022
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Motivation
Fixes #11156
On
ServerCnxwe're using the consumer name which is an optional field in the protobuf definition, without checking if the field was set. While Java/C++/Go are always setting that field, other client might not passing it.