[website][upgrade] fix: resolve compatibilities for docs migration of version next/2.8.0/2.7.3 - #12415
Merged
Anonymitaet merged 18 commits intoOct 22, 2021
Conversation
Signed-off-by: LiLi <urfreespace@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: LiLi <urfreespace@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: LiLi <urfreespace@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: LiLi <urfreespace@gmail.com>
Contributor
|
@urfreespace:Thanks for your contribution. For this PR, do we need to update docs? |
Member
Author
|
@Anonymitaet @tuteng PTAL, thanks. |
Anonymitaet
added
doc
Member
|
Display issues: 2.8.0 2.8.0 & 2.7.3
|
Member
Member
|
#1 #2 |
Member
|
I've finished the review, PTAL, thanks. |
Member
Author
|
@Anonymitaet all resolved, PTAL, thanks. |
Anonymitaet
self-requested a review
October 22, 2021 07:44
Anonymitaet
approved these changes
Oct 22, 2021
eolivelli
pushed a commit
to eolivelli/pulsar
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 29, 2021
… version next/2.8.0/2.7.3 (apache#12415) * feat: docs fix for 2.8.0 Signed-off-by: LiLi <urfreespace@gmail.com> * feat: docs fix for 2.7.3 Signed-off-by: LiLi <urfreespace@gmail.com> * feat: docs fix for next version Signed-off-by: LiLi <urfreespace@gmail.com> * update Signed-off-by: LiLi <urfreespace@gmail.com> * patch Signed-off-by: LiLi <urfreespace@gmail.com> * upgrade dependencies Signed-off-by: LiLi <urfreespace@gmail.com> * update Signed-off-by: LiLi <urfreespace@gmail.com> * update Signed-off-by: LiLi <urfreespace@gmail.com> * update Signed-off-by: LiLi <urfreespace@gmail.com> * update Signed-off-by: LiLi <urfreespace@gmail.com> * update Signed-off-by: LiLi <urfreespace@gmail.com> * update Signed-off-by: LiLi <urfreespace@gmail.com> * update Signed-off-by: LiLi <urfreespace@gmail.com> * update Signed-off-by: LiLi <urfreespace@gmail.com> * update Signed-off-by: LiLi <urfreespace@gmail.com> * update Signed-off-by: LiLi <urfreespace@gmail.com> * update Signed-off-by: LiLi <urfreespace@gmail.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Master Issue: #11766
Motivation
website upgrade
Modifications
Click to Preview
Verifying this change
(Please pick either of the following options)
This change is a trivial rework / code cleanup without any test coverage.
(or)
This change is already covered by existing tests, such as (please describe tests).
(or)
This change added tests and can be verified as follows:
(example:)
Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts:
If
yeswas chosen, please highlight the changesDocumentation
For contributor
For this PR, do we need to update docs?
If yes, please update docs or create a follow-up issue if you need help.
If no, please explain why.
For committer
For this PR, do we need to update docs?
If yes,
if you update docs in this PR, label this PR with the
doclabel.if you plan to update docs later, label this PR with the
doc-requiredlabel.if you need help on updating docs, create a follow-up issue with the
doc-requiredlabel.If no, label this PR with the
no-need-doclabel and explain why.