[owasp] add suppression for Kotlin stdlib CVE-2022-24329 - part 2 - #14715
Merged
Conversation
codelipenghui
approved these changes
Mar 16, 2022
Contributor
Author
|
/pulsarbot rerun-failure-checks |
1 similar comment
Contributor
Author
|
/pulsarbot rerun-failure-checks |
nodece
approved these changes
Mar 17, 2022
nicoloboschi
added a commit
to datastax/pulsar
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 17, 2022
…ache#14715) (cherry picked from commit 828d057)
aparajita89
pushed a commit
to aparajita89/pulsar
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 21, 2022
Nicklee007
pushed a commit
to Nicklee007/pulsar
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 20, 2022
nicoloboschi
added a commit
to datastax/pulsar
that referenced
this pull request
May 5, 2022
…ache#14715) (cherry picked from commit 828d057)
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Motivation
Owasp check is failing due to Kotlin. We haven't completely fixed it in #14629
The reasons are the same written in #14629
note: the check still fail due to #14630
note2: please port this, along with #14629, to branch-2.9
Modifications
no-need-doc