[fix][client]sendMessage param miss in createOpSendMsg cause CI Build Error

[Nicklee007]

Motivation

Fix sendMessage param miss in createOpSendMsg which will cause build error.

Build error cause
https://github.com/apache/pulsar/runs/8032271109?check_suite_focus=true

Error:  COMPILATION ERROR : 
[INFO] -------------------------------------------------------------
Error:  /Users/runner/work/pulsar/pulsar/pulsar-client/src/main/java/org/apache/pulsar/client/impl/BatchMessageContainerImpl.java:[224,39] no suitable method found for sendMessage(long,long,int,org.apache.pulsar.common.api.proto.MessageMetadata,io.netty.buffer.ByteBuf)
    method org.apache.pulsar.client.impl.ProducerImpl.sendMessage(long,long,int,org.apache.pulsar.client.api.MessageId,org.apache.pulsar.common.api.proto.MessageMetadata,io.netty.buffer.ByteBuf) is not applicable
      (actual and formal argument lists differ in length)
    method org.apache.pulsar.client.impl.ProducerImpl.sendMessage(long,long,long,int,org.apache.pulsar.common.api.proto.MessageMetadata,io.netty.buffer.ByteBuf) is not applicable
      (actual and formal argument lists differ in length)

pulsar/pulsar-client/src/main/java/org/apache/pulsar/client/impl/BatchMessageContainerImpl.java

Lines 217 to 223 in c13e669

	public OpSendMsg createOpSendMsg() throws IOException {
	if (messages.size() == 1) {
	messageMetadata.clear();
	messageMetadata.copyFrom(messages.get(0).getMessageBuilder());
	ByteBuf encryptedPayload = producer.encryptMessage(messageMetadata, getCompressedBatchMetadataAndPayload());
	ByteBufPair cmd = producer.sendMessage(producer.producerId, messageMetadata.getSequenceId(),
	1, messageMetadata, encryptedPayload);

Modifications

1. add the missed sendMessage param;

Documentation

• doc-not-needed
  (Please explain why)

[gaozhangmin]

Why the CI doesn't run failed for now?

[coderzc]

Why the CI doesn't run failed for now?

I think because we don‘t mandatorily rebase master before merge PR.

[lhotari]

This doesn't look right. Are you sure that this is the correct way to fix this?

[lhotari]

See #17195 . PIP-180 is for the shadow replicator. null should be passed here. I created another PR #17300 since I didn't notice this PR and I digged the reason why things broke.

[lhotari]

@Jason918 PTAL. isn't it null that should be passed here?

[Jason918]

@lhotari Actually, both is fine. ShadowReplicator won't use batch producing.

[eolivelli]

@lhotari is right

closing this PR, thank you @Nicklee007