[improve][broker] ENABLE_IO_URING property name

[coderzc]

Motivation

#18385 (comment)

Modifications

improve ENABLE_IO_URING property name

Documentation

• doc
• doc-required
• doc-not-needed
• doc-complete

Matching PR in forked repository

PR in forked repository:

[coderzc]

/cc @tisonkun @nodece

[nodece]

This feature should add a documentation.

[coderzc]

This feature should add a documentation.

Which should be added to the section is better?

[nodece]

This feature should add a documentation.

Which should be added to the section is better?

/cc @momo-jun @Anonymitaet

[momo-jun]

@coderzc can you pls provide more context about this improvement?

1. What is the pain point or challenge that it solves? How it helps users?
2. What is the best way for a user to take advantage of it? If this is a change to something that already exists, what does the user need to do differently as a result?
3. Any use case or technical assumptions? And how to use it?

[coderzc]

@coderzc can you pls provide more context about this improvement?

1. What is the pain point or challenge that it solves? How it helps users?
2. What is the best way for a user to take advantage of it? If this is a change to something that already exists, what does the user need to do differently as a result?
3. Any use case or technical assumptions? And how to use it?

This is network IO mode that can improve performance under specific operating system, but this feature is still considered experimental, you need to enable it with a system property.

[tisonkun]

Still I'd prefer enableUring which I believe follow both Java's and IOUring's idom.

The document part can be a separate issue.

+1 to merge.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 47.25%. Comparing base (b31c5a6) to head (08df150).
⚠️ Report is 3355 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master   #18402      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     46.98%   47.25%   +0.26%     
- Complexity    10343    10419      +76     
============================================
  Files           692      697       +5     
  Lines         67766    67970     +204     
  Branches       7259     7275      +16     
============================================
+ Hits          31842    32116     +274     
+ Misses        32344    32272      -72     
- Partials       3580     3582       +2     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	47.25% <ø> (+0.26%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
see 62 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[tisonkun]

Meriging...