[fix][doc]Add docs for ThresholdShedder - #18675
Conversation
Co-authored-by: Anonymitaet <50226895+Anonymitaet@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Anonymitaet <50226895+Anonymitaet@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Anonymitaet <50226895+Anonymitaet@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Anonymitaet <50226895+Anonymitaet@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: momo-jun <60642177+momo-jun@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: momo-jun <60642177+momo-jun@users.noreply.github.com>
|
@315157973 thanks for adding the docs! |
Co-authored-by: momo-jun <60642177+momo-jun@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: momo-jun <60642177+momo-jun@users.noreply.github.com>
This part explain the load balancing strategy. If we divide them into two parts, the meaning will be incoherent |
Also make sense. My thought - it breaks the coherent content of |
Co-authored-by: Anonymitaet <50226895+Anonymitaet@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: momo-jun <60642177+momo-jun@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Anonymitaet <50226895+Anonymitaet@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: momo-jun <60642177+momo-jun@users.noreply.github.com>
Motivation
Add docs for ThresholdShedder
#17456
Documentation
docdoc-requireddoc-not-neededdoc-complete