[revert][misc] "modify check waitingForPingResponse with volatile (#12615)"#19439
Merged
michaeljmarshall merged 1 commit intoFeb 8, 2023
Merged
Conversation
…)" This reverts commit 62e2547.
michaeljmarshall
added
area/broker
area/proxy
component/client-java
doc-not-needed
Technoboy-
approved these changes
Feb 7, 2023
michaeljmarshall
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 8, 2023
…2615)" (#19439) This reverts commit 62e2547. ### Motivation The motivation for #12615 relies on an incorrect understanding of Netty's threading model. The `ctx.executor()` is the context's event loop thread that is the same thread used to process messages. The `waitingForPingResponse` variable is only ever updated/read from the context's event loop, so there is no need to make the variable `volatile`. ### Modifications * Remove `volatile` keyword for `waitingForPingResponse` ### Verifying this change Read through all references to the variable. ### Documentation - [x] `doc-not-needed` ### Matching PR in forked repository PR in forked repository: Skipping for this trivial PR. (cherry picked from commit fb28d83)
michaeljmarshall
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 8, 2023
…2615)" (#19439) This reverts commit 62e2547. ### Motivation The motivation for #12615 relies on an incorrect understanding of Netty's threading model. The `ctx.executor()` is the context's event loop thread that is the same thread used to process messages. The `waitingForPingResponse` variable is only ever updated/read from the context's event loop, so there is no need to make the variable `volatile`. ### Modifications * Remove `volatile` keyword for `waitingForPingResponse` ### Verifying this change Read through all references to the variable. ### Documentation - [x] `doc-not-needed` ### Matching PR in forked repository PR in forked repository: Skipping for this trivial PR. (cherry picked from commit fb28d83)
michaeljmarshall
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 8, 2023
…2615)" (#19439) This reverts commit 62e2547. ### Motivation The motivation for #12615 relies on an incorrect understanding of Netty's threading model. The `ctx.executor()` is the context's event loop thread that is the same thread used to process messages. The `waitingForPingResponse` variable is only ever updated/read from the context's event loop, so there is no need to make the variable `volatile`. ### Modifications * Remove `volatile` keyword for `waitingForPingResponse` ### Verifying this change Read through all references to the variable. ### Documentation - [x] `doc-not-needed` ### Matching PR in forked repository PR in forked repository: Skipping for this trivial PR. (cherry picked from commit fb28d83)
michaeljmarshall
added
cherry-picked/branch-2.9
nicoloboschi
pushed a commit
to datastax/pulsar
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 28, 2023
…ache#12615)" (apache#19439) This reverts commit 62e2547. ### Motivation The motivation for apache#12615 relies on an incorrect understanding of Netty's threading model. The `ctx.executor()` is the context's event loop thread that is the same thread used to process messages. The `waitingForPingResponse` variable is only ever updated/read from the context's event loop, so there is no need to make the variable `volatile`. ### Modifications * Remove `volatile` keyword for `waitingForPingResponse` ### Verifying this change Read through all references to the variable. ### Documentation - [x] `doc-not-needed` ### Matching PR in forked repository PR in forked repository: Skipping for this trivial PR. (cherry picked from commit fb28d83) (cherry picked from commit f6da22b)
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This reverts commit 62e2547.
Motivation
The motivation for #12615 relies on an incorrect understanding of Netty's threading model. The
ctx.executor()is the context's event loop thread that is the same thread used to process messages. ThewaitingForPingResponsevariable is only ever updated/read from the context's event loop, so there is no need to make the variablevolatile.Modifications
volatilekeyword forwaitingForPingResponseVerifying this change
Read through all references to the variable.
Documentation
doc-not-neededMatching PR in forked repository
PR in forked repository: Skipping for this trivial PR.