Skip to content

Revert "[improve] configure whether function consumer should skip to latest (#17214)" - #19651

Closed
michaeljmarshall wants to merge 1 commit into
apache:masterfrom
michaeljmarshall:revert-17214
Closed

Revert "[improve] configure whether function consumer should skip to latest (#17214)"#19651
michaeljmarshall wants to merge 1 commit into
apache:masterfrom
michaeljmarshall:revert-17214

Conversation

@michaeljmarshall

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This reverts commit bf982f4.

Motivation

In #17214, we added a new protobuf field without a PIP. In order to ensure this code is not released, I propose that we revert this commit now and only move forward once it has been accepted through a PIP (or a discussion on the mailing list if a PIP is deemed unnecessary).

Documentation

  • doc-not-needed

This is just reverting a commit, and there were no external docs merged for that commit, so no docs need to be updated.

@nlu90

nlu90 commented Mar 1, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@michaeljmarshall When is the next release?

Let's do an expedited discussion in the mailing list before reverting the change if the release date is not this week.
If people have great concerns about the PR and agree it will break things, we will revert it. Otherwise, we can keep it there.

@nlu90

nlu90 commented Mar 1, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@michaeljmarshall I just sent out the discussion email, could you take a look and provide feedback?

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Apr 1, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The pr had no activity for 30 days, mark with Stale label.

@github-actions github-actions Bot added the Stale label Apr 1, 2023
@michaeljmarshall
michaeljmarshall deleted the revert-17214 branch April 3, 2023 03:28
@michaeljmarshall

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@nlu90 - thanks for taking care of the discussion. I am not opinionated on the change in the commit. I just wanted to make sure we gave people a chance to discuss the change.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants