[Transaction] Support produce batch transaction messages#8011
Closed
gaoran10 wants to merge 2 commits into
Closed
Conversation
16 tasks
Member
|
todo: extends keybasedcontainer |
gaoran10
force-pushed
the
txn-produce-batch-message
branch
2 times, most recently
from
September 20, 2020 17:54
28fbdb4 to
d5fcb4c
Compare
gaoran10
force-pushed
the
txn-produce-batch-message
branch
from
September 25, 2020 03:03
d5fcb4c to
fd4a4a0
Compare
gaoran10
force-pushed
the
txn-produce-batch-message
branch
from
October 15, 2020 06:43
fd4a4a0 to
2a2c6ef
Compare
Contributor
|
Dup with #8415 |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Motivation
Currently, we couldn't produce batch transaction messages.
Modifications
Support produces batch transaction messages based on
BatchMessageKeyBasedContainer.Verifying this change
This change added tests and can be verified as follows:
Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts:
If
yeswas chosen, please highlight the changesDocumentation