[Pulsar sql] Support keyValue Schema add integration test.#9388
Conversation
sijie
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@congbobo184 Can you add an integration test to test KeyValue schema with both separate and inline modes?
OK |
…upport # Conflicts: # pulsar-sql/presto-pulsar/src/main/java/org/apache/pulsar/sql/presto/AvroSchemaHandler.java # pulsar-sql/presto-pulsar/src/main/java/org/apache/pulsar/sql/presto/KeyValueSchemaHandler.java # pulsar-sql/presto-pulsar/src/main/java/org/apache/pulsar/sql/presto/PulsarRecordCursor.java # pulsar-sql/presto-pulsar/src/main/java/org/apache/pulsar/sql/presto/PulsarSchemaHandlers.java # pulsar-sql/presto-pulsar/src/main/java/org/apache/pulsar/sql/presto/PulsarSqlSchemaInfoProvider.java # pulsar-sql/presto-pulsar/src/test/java/org/apache/pulsar/sql/presto/TestPulsarKeyValueSchemaHandler.java # pulsar-sql/presto-pulsar/src/test/java/org/apache/pulsar/sql/presto/TestPulsarPrimitiveSchemaHandler.java
|
#8422 has solve this problem, so this PR only add the test |
I added |
Yes, it lack integration test. If you want to add the test, i will close this PR. |
thanks for replay , I'm not working the integration tests. |
|
@hnail OK, i will work on this pr. thanks reply. |
|
/pulsarbot run-failure-checks |
|
/pulsarbot run-failure-checks |
|
@sijie Please help take a look at this PR again. @congbobo184 Could you please check the branch-2.7? I think branch-2.7 does not work. Since we can't cherry-pick #8422, could you please create a PR to fix the branch-2.7? |
|
#9685 is fixing the branch-2.7 |
Motivation
Add the test for pulsar-sql support keyValue schema
implement
Add the test
Verifying this change
Add the test for it
Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts:
If yes was chosen, please highlight the changes
Dependencies (does it add or upgrade a dependency): (no)
The public API: (no)
The schema: (no)
The default values of configurations: (no)
The wire protocol: (no)
The rest endpoints: (no)
The admin cli options: (no)
Anything that affects deployment: (no)