Skip to content

[SPARK-26503][CORE][DOC][FOLLOWUP] Get rid of spark.sql.legacy.timeParser.enabled#23529

Closed
MaxGekk wants to merge 2 commits into
apache:masterfrom
MaxGekk:get-rid-off-legacy-parser-followup
Closed

[SPARK-26503][CORE][DOC][FOLLOWUP] Get rid of spark.sql.legacy.timeParser.enabled#23529
MaxGekk wants to merge 2 commits into
apache:masterfrom
MaxGekk:get-rid-off-legacy-parser-followup

Conversation

@MaxGekk

@MaxGekk MaxGekk commented Jan 12, 2019

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

The SQL config spark.sql.legacy.timeParser.enabled was removed by #23495. The PR cleans up the SQL migration guide and the comment for UnixTimestamp.

@MaxGekk

MaxGekk commented Jan 12, 2019

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@srowen I accidentally found the config in a comment.

@SparkQA

SparkQA commented Jan 12, 2019

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Test build #101131 has finished for PR 23529 at commit 496e061.

  • This patch fails Spark unit tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@SparkQA

SparkQA commented Jan 13, 2019

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Test build #4507 has finished for PR 23529 at commit 496e061.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@HyukjinKwon

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Merged to master.

@asfgit asfgit closed this in 4ff2b94 Jan 13, 2019
jackylee-ch pushed a commit to jackylee-ch/spark that referenced this pull request Feb 18, 2019
…rser.enabled

## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

The SQL config `spark.sql.legacy.timeParser.enabled` was removed by apache#23495. The PR cleans up the SQL migration guide and the comment for `UnixTimestamp`.

Closes apache#23529 from MaxGekk/get-rid-off-legacy-parser-followup.

Authored-by: Maxim Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
@MaxGekk MaxGekk deleted the get-rid-off-legacy-parser-followup branch August 17, 2019 13:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants