Skip to content

[SPARK-6397][SQL] Check the missingInput simply#5132

Closed
watermen wants to merge 1 commit into
apache:masterfrom
watermen:sql-missingInput-new
Closed

[SPARK-6397][SQL] Check the missingInput simply#5132
watermen wants to merge 1 commit into
apache:masterfrom
watermen:sql-missingInput-new

Conversation

@watermen

@watermen watermen commented Mar 23, 2015

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@watermen watermen force-pushed the sql-missingInput-new branch from 705c684 to 1e5bdc5 Compare March 23, 2015 07:20
@liancheng

liancheng commented Mar 23, 2015

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

ok to test

@liancheng

liancheng commented Mar 23, 2015

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

LGTM pending Jenkins.

@liancheng liancheng mentioned this pull request Mar 23, 2015
Closed
@SparkQA

SparkQA commented Mar 23, 2015

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Test build #28984 has finished for PR 5132 at commit 1e5bdc5.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@watermen

watermen commented Mar 23, 2015

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@liancheng

@liancheng

liancheng commented Mar 23, 2015

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Thanks, merging to master and branch-1.3.

asfgit pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 23, 2015
@watermen @liancheng
[SPARK-6397][SQL] Check the missingInput simply
a29f493 
#5082

/cc liancheng

Author: Yadong Qi <qiyadong2010@gmail.com>

Closes #5132 from watermen/sql-missingInput-new and squashes the following commits:

1e5bdc5 [Yadong Qi] Check the missingInput simply

(cherry picked from commit 9f3273b)
Signed-off-by: Cheng Lian <lian@databricks.com>
@asfgit asfgit closed this in 9f3273b Mar 23, 2015
@liancheng liancheng mentioned this pull request Mar 23, 2015
Closed
@watermen watermen deleted the sql-missingInput-new branch April 21, 2015 03:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@watermen @liancheng @SparkQA