SPARK-1759

[pjopensource]

No description provided.

[pjopensource]

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-1759

[AmplabJenkins]

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

[srowen]

I don't think it's intended that you use sbt/sbt for other projects. It's specific to Spark. Right? You can use the regular sbt app of course.

[pjopensource]

yes, it's specific to spark.

2014-05-08 20:52 GMT+08:00 Sean Owen notifications@github.com:

I don't think it's intended that you use sbt/sbt for other projects. It's
specific to Spark. Right? You can use the regular sbt app of course.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//pull/693#issuecomment-42545954
.

[srowen]

Yes, so if you are making your own separate project, even if it's Spark-based, you should be using the regular SBT and its sbt binary in your build, not this script that is for building Spark itself, IIUC. This would now require now setting SPARK_HOME, for example, when it seems a little funny to have to do so from the top-level of the project itself.

[pjopensource]

OK,I see. The sbt script in spark is just for building the Spark itself,not
for other project.Thanks very much.
I was confused by the quickstart doc
http://spark.apache.org/docs/latest/quick-start.html,it use the sbt/sbt to
build the simpleApp project. maybe we should revise the doc.

2014-05-08 22:14 GMT+08:00 Sean Owen notifications@github.com:

Yes, so if you are making your own separate project, even if it's
Spark-based, you should be using the regular SBT and its sbt binary in
your build, not this script that is for building Spark itself, IIUC. This
would now require now setting SPARK_HOME, for example, when it seems a
little funny to have to do so from the top-level of the project itself.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//pull/693#issuecomment-42554599
.

[srowen]

Yes, maybe someone can double-check me, but I imagine it is meant to show using just sbt. There is no sbt/ directory created in this sample to begin with, and the script doesn't seem set up to be used elsewhere for the reason you give. Maybe change your PR to instead suggest the doc change?

[rxin]

Do you mind closing this if it is no longer necessary? Thanks.