[Fix][TIR] UnifyThreadBinding creating unit loop with annotation#14588
Merged
tqchen merged 1 commit intoapache:mainfrom Apr 12, 2023
Merged
Conversation
Collaborator
|
Thanks for contributing to TVM! Please refer to the contributing guidelines https://tvm.apache.org/docs/contribute/ for useful information and tips. Please request code reviews from Reviewers by @-ing them in a comment.
Generated by tvm-bot |
This PR fixes a behavior of the UnifyThreadBinding pass which (at one place) assumes a return value is always a ForNode, which is not right. To be more specific, when a thread-binding loop has an annotation, the current behavior is assuming that the post-recursive-mutation value is also a ForNode, and apply the previous annotation directly to the new loop. However, the post-recursive-mutation value is also possibly not a ForNode. In this case, the current behavior is incorrect. This PR creates a new unit-length loop in this case to preserve the annotation. Thanks Bohan for catching this issue. Co-authored-by: Bohan Hou <spectrometerh@gmail.com>
MasterJH5574
force-pushed
the
tvm-dev/2023-04-11-unify-thread-binding-ann
branch
from
f535608 to
b30a55b
Compare
tqchen
approved these changes
Apr 11, 2023
MasterJH5574
added a commit
to mlc-ai/relax
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 11, 2023
…notation (apache/tvm#14588) (#187) This PR fixes a behavior of the UnifyThreadBinding pass which (at one place) assumes a return value is always a ForNode, which is not right. To be more specific, when a thread-binding loop has an annotation, the current behavior is assuming that the post-recursive-mutation value is also a ForNode, and apply the previous annotation directly to the new loop. However, the post-recursive-mutation value is also possibly not a ForNode. In this case, the current behavior is incorrect. This PR creates a new unit-length loop in this case to preserve the annotation. Thanks Bohan for catching this issue. Co-authored-by: Bohan Hou <spectrometerh@gmail.com>
Contributor
Author
|
@tvm-bot rerun |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR fixes a behavior of the UnifyThreadBinding pass which (at one place) assumes a return value is always a ForNode, which is not right.
To be more specific, when a thread-binding loop has an annotation, the current behavior is assuming that the post-recursive-mutation value is also a ForNode, and apply the previous annotation directly to the new loop. However, the post-recursive-mutation value is also possibly not a ForNode. In this case, the current behavior is incorrect.
This PR creates a new unit-length loop in this case to preserve the annotation.
Thanks Bohan for catching this issue.
Co-authored-by: Bohan Hou spectrometerh@gmail.com