SHARD_BATCH_SIZE=0 does not work the same way as it used to anymore after #40, and if you set it will panic with "chunk size must be non-zero" here
As far as I can tell this is also an issue in current upstream dev, but it might be possible to change that particular code to handle SHARD_BATCH_SIZE=0 and revert to previous behavior (I think), hopefully in a minimally intrusive way
This is because this check still exists, but no longer works due to the new code here
Originally posted by @wwared in #40 (comment)
SHARD_BATCH_SIZE=0does not work the same way as it used to anymore after #40, and if you set it will panic with "chunk size must be non-zero" hereAs far as I can tell this is also an issue in current upstream dev, but it might be possible to change that particular code to handle
SHARD_BATCH_SIZE=0and revert to previous behavior (I think), hopefully in a minimally intrusive wayThis is because this check still exists, but no longer works due to the new code here
Originally posted by @wwared in #40 (comment)