Signoz codex native telemetry#8
Conversation
# Conflicts: # skills/memory-refiner/scripts/list_memory_surfaces.py
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: edfeaa30b2
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
|
@codex review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 1972074f77
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 04b20ca4d7
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 67b8870649
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: e1387383aa
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
|
@codex review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 7014f30fc8
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
…and fix remote asset sync paths Co-authored-by: Junie <junie@jetbrains.com>
|
@codex review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 555d40fa5d
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
|
@codex review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: af72463af5
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
| os.environ.setdefault( | ||
| CLICKHOUSE_WRITE_DSN_ENV, | ||
| ( | ||
| f"tcp://{CLICKHOUSE_WRITE_USER}:{os.environ[CLICKHOUSE_WRITE_PASSWORD_ENV]}" | ||
| "@clickhouse:9000" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Recompute ClickHouse DSN when password env changes
If a user later pins SIGNOZ_CODEX_CLICKHOUSE_WRITE_PASSWORD (as suggested in runtime.env.example) after local/generated/clickhouse.env already exists, _load_env_file can restore an old SIGNOZ_CODEX_CLICKHOUSE_WRITE_DSN and this setdefault never rebuilds it from the new password. That leaves ClickHouse users rendered with the new password while SigNoz/collector still connect with the stale DSN password, causing authentication failures until the DSN is manually overridden or the generated env file is cleaned.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
| with socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM) as sock: | ||
| sock.settimeout(1) | ||
| return sock.connect_ex((stack_host(runtime), port)) == 0 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Handle IPv6 stack hosts in health port checks
The health probe hard-codes AF_INET, so when stack_host resolves to an IPv6 literal (for example from a remote Docker context like tcp://[2001:db8::1]:2376 with non-loopback bind), connect_ex raises gaierror instead of returning a probe result. In that environment signoz-codex health can crash rather than reporting status, so the probe should use address-family-agnostic resolution.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
No description provided.