Fix unbound variable when running container_image targets#2008
Merged
alexeagle merged 1 commit intobazelbuild:masterfrom Jan 20, 2022
UebelAndre:run
Merged
Fix unbound variable when running container_image targets#2008alexeagle merged 1 commit intobazelbuild:masterfrom UebelAndre:run
alexeagle merged 1 commit intobazelbuild:masterfrom
UebelAndre:run
Conversation
alexeagle
approved these changes
Jan 20, 2022
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
PR Checklist
Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:
PR Type
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
What is the current behavior?
Currently running something like the following produces an error
container_args[@]: unbound variableIssue Number: This is a minor bugfix to #1957
What is the new behavior?
This fixes the issue and I'm able to run my container and start a bash shell based on the arguments above.
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
Other information