feat: allow audit task to run bootstrap

[bastienboutonnet]

Description

In #233 we added a new task called bootstrap which creates models and column placeholders. Users might want to make the audit task optionally call the bootstrap first which they can now do by calling audit with --bootstrap

How was the change tested

(If you have implemented unit tests you can list them and give some context on what they cover. If you did not implement unit testing or the change is harder to test, tell us how you made sure your change worked so we can reproduce it and check that all the bases are covered)

Issue Information

Resolves #210
(If your PR addresses or closes a GitHub issue please write "Closes #<issue_number>" or something like that).

Checklist

(Ideally, all boxes are checked by the time we merged the PR, if you don't know how to do any of these don't hesitate to say so in the PR and we'll help you out.)

• I formatted my PR name according to CONTRIBUTING.md
• I added a news fragment to help populating the changelog as encouraged in CONTRIBUTING.md
• I added "Closes #<issue_number>" in the "Issue Information" section (if no issue, feel free to tick thick the box anyway).

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #239 (3dce09e) into dev/0.1.0 (b1ecc6b) will decrease coverage by 0.25%.
The diff coverage is 28.57%.

@@              Coverage Diff              @@
##           dev/0.1.0     #239      +/-   ##
=============================================
- Coverage      82.86%   82.60%   -0.26%     
=============================================
  Files             19       19              
  Lines           1167     1173       +6     
=============================================
+ Hits             967      969       +2     
- Misses           200      204       +4     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	82.60% <28.57%> (-0.26%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
dbt_sugar/core/main.py	70.40% <16.66%> (-2.72%)	⬇️
dbt_sugar/core/flags.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update b1ecc6b...3dce09e. Read the comment docs.

[sourcery-ai]

Sourcery Code Quality Report

❌  Merging this PR will decrease code quality in the affected files by 1.76%.

Quality metrics	Before	After	Change
Complexity	3.40 ⭐	4.01 ⭐	0.61 👎
Method Length	91.00 🙂	95.89 🙂	4.89 👎
Working memory	8.93 🙂	8.99 🙂	0.06 👎
Quality	64.49% 🙂	62.73% 🙂	-1.76% 👎

Other metrics	Before	After	Change
Lines	307	327	20

Changed files	Quality Before	Quality After	Quality Change
dbt_sugar/core/flags.py	73.35% 🙂	72.66% 🙂	-0.69% 👎
dbt_sugar/core/main.py	60.46% 🙂	58.38% 🙂	-2.08% 👎

Here are some functions in these files that still need a tune-up:

File	Function	Complexity	Length	Working Memory	Quality	Recommendation
dbt_sugar/core/main.py	handle	8 ⭐	193 😞	11 😞	49.20% 😞	Try splitting into smaller methods. Extract out complex expressions
dbt_sugar/core/flags.py	FlagParser.consume_cli_arguments	8 ⭐	143 😞	7 🙂	62.44% 🙂	Try splitting into smaller methods
dbt_sugar/core/main.py	main	3 ⭐	78 🙂	13 😞	63.96% 🙂	Extract out complex expressions

Legend and Explanation

The emojis denote the absolute quality of the code:

• ⭐ excellent
• 🙂 good
• 😞 poor
• ⛔ very poor

The 👍 and 👎 indicate whether the quality has improved or gotten worse with this pull request.

---

Please see our documentation here for details on how these metrics are calculated.

We are actively working on this report - lots more documentation and extra metrics to come!

Let us know what you think of it by mentioning @sourcery-ai in a comment.

[virvirlopez]

LGTM