fix: init audit after bootstrap in the --bootstrap run

[bastienboutonnet]

Description

When running audit --bootstrap while the bootstrap was running successfully, we were initialising the audit task before the bootstrap task. Since the audit task builds its knowledge of dbt models and their descriptions at __init__() time, the bootstrapped model descriptors were not yet available.

This PR moves the initialisation of audit task to after the bootstrap task has run.

How was the change tested

Tested interactively

Issue Information

(If your PR addresses or closes a GitHub issue please write "Closes #<issue_number>" or something like that).

Checklist

(Ideally, all boxes are checked by the time we merged the PR, if you don't know how to do any of these don't hesitate to say so in the PR and we'll help you out.)

• I formatted my PR name according to CONTRIBUTING.md
• I added a news fragment to help populating the changelog as encouraged in CONTRIBUTING.md

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #252 (495699c) into main (75368b3) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 40.00%.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #252   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   82.48%   82.48%           
=======================================
  Files          20       20           
  Lines        1205     1205           
=======================================
  Hits          994      994           
  Misses        211      211           

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	82.48% <40.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
dbt_sugar/core/main.py	70.40% <0.00%> (ø)
dbt_sugar/core/task/doc.py	67.85% <0.00%> (ø)
dbt_sugar/__init__.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
dbt_sugar/core/_version.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 75368b3...495699c. Read the comment docs.

[sourcery-ai]

Sourcery Code Quality Report

✅  Merging this PR will increase code quality in the affected files by 0.01%.

Quality metrics	Before	After	Change
Complexity	4.98 ⭐	4.98 ⭐	0.00
Method Length	80.83 🙂	80.79 🙂	-0.04 👍
Working memory	10.31 😞	10.31 😞	0.00
Quality	62.53% 🙂	62.54% 🙂	0.01% 👍

Other metrics	Before	After	Change
Lines	738	743	5

Changed files	Quality Before	Quality After	Quality Change
dbt_sugar/init.py	100.00% ⭐	100.00% ⭐	0.00%
dbt_sugar/core/_version.py	100.00% ⭐	100.00% ⭐	0.00%
dbt_sugar/core/main.py	58.38% 🙂	58.38% 🙂	0.00%
dbt_sugar/core/task/doc.py	64.06% 🙂	64.07% 🙂	0.01% 👍

Here are some functions in these files that still need a tune-up:

File	Function	Complexity	Length	Working Memory	Quality	Recommendation
dbt_sugar/core/task/doc.py	DocumentationTask.check_tests	12 🙂	143 😞	15 😞	44.29% 😞	Try splitting into smaller methods. Extract out complex expressions
dbt_sugar/core/main.py	handle	8 ⭐	193 😞	11 😞	49.20% 😞	Try splitting into smaller methods. Extract out complex expressions
dbt_sugar/core/task/doc.py	DocumentationTask.update_model	14 🙂	96 🙂	13 😞	51.12% 🙂	Extract out complex expressions
dbt_sugar/core/task/doc.py	DocumentationTask.document_columns	5 ⭐	149 😞	12 😞	54.43% 🙂	Try splitting into smaller methods. Extract out complex expressions
dbt_sugar/core/task/doc.py	DocumentationTask.update_model_description	7 ⭐	81 🙂	13 😞	59.61% 🙂	Extract out complex expressions

Legend and Explanation

The emojis denote the absolute quality of the code:

• ⭐ excellent
• 🙂 good
• 😞 poor
• ⛔ very poor

The 👍 and 👎 indicate whether the quality has improved or gotten worse with this pull request.

---

Please see our documentation here for details on how these metrics are calculated.

We are actively working on this report - lots more documentation and extra metrics to come!

Let us know what you think of it by mentioning @sourcery-ai in a comment.