[pre-commit.ci] pre-commit autoupdate

[pre-commit-ci]

updates:

• github.com/crate-ci/typos: typos-dict-v0.13.13 → v1
• github.com/rvben/rumdl-pre-commit: v0.0.199 → v0.0.206

---

Important

Update typos and rumdl-pre-commit hooks in .pre-commit-config.yaml to latest versions.

• Pre-commit Hook Updates:
  • Update typos hook from typos-dict-v0.13.13 to v1 in .pre-commit-config.yaml.
  • Update rumdl-pre-commit hook from v0.0.199 to v0.0.206 in .pre-commit-config.yaml.

^{This description was created by for 503a634. You can customize this summary. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.}

[semanticdiff-com]

Review changes with  

Changed Files

File	Status
.pre-commit-config.yaml	0% smaller

[ellipsis-dev]

Important

Looks good to me! 👍

Reviewed everything up to 503a634 in 33 seconds. Click for details.

• Reviewed 18 lines of code in 1 files
• Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
• Skipped posting 2 draft comments. View those below.
• Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.

1. .pre-commit-config.yaml:15

• Draft comment:
  Ensure v1 for the 'typos' hook is fully compatible; check for any breaking changes in the changelog.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful = 0% <= threshold 50% This comment is asking the PR author to ensure compatibility and check for breaking changes, which falls under the rule of not asking the author to double-check things or ensure behavior. It doesn't provide a specific suggestion or point out a specific issue.

2. .pre-commit-config.yaml:19

• Draft comment:
  Confirm that the rumdl-pre-commit update to v0.0.206 behaves as expected with no regressions.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful = 0% <= threshold 50% This comment is asking the PR author to confirm the behavior of a dependency update, which violates the rule against asking for confirmation or ensuring behavior is intended. It does not provide a specific suggestion or point out a specific issue.

Workflow ID: wflow_s1M5TKNZ6YdeV9JI

^{You can customize by changing your verbosity settings, reacting with 👍 or 👎, replying to comments, or adding code review rules.}

[llamapreview]

Auto Pull Request Review from LlamaPReview

Review Status: Automated Review Skipped

Dear contributor,

Thank you for your Pull Request. LlamaPReview has analyzed your changes and determined that this PR does not require an automated code review.

Analysis Result:

PR contains only dependency version updates in pre-commit hooks configuration with no substantive code changes or logic modifications

We're continuously improving our PR analysis capabilities. Have thoughts on when and how LlamaPReview should perform automated reviews? Share your insights in our GitHub Discussions.

Best regards,
LlamaPReview Team