Skip to content

feat(clerk-js): Autoswitch to phone input if the only sign in initial value is the phone number - #1861

Merged
desiprisg merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
george/usr-405-autoswitch-to-phone-number-input-on-sign-in-start-if-just
Oct 12, 2023
Merged

feat(clerk-js): Autoswitch to phone input if the only sign in initial value is the phone number#1861
desiprisg merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
george/usr-405-autoswitch-to-phone-number-input-on-sign-in-start-if-just

Conversation

@desiprisg

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description

Start with the phone input if the only sign in initial value is the phone number.

Checklist

  • npm test runs as expected.
  • npm run build runs as expected.
  • (If applicable) JSDoc comments have been added or updated for any package exports
  • (If applicable) Documentation has been updated

Type of change

  • 🐛 Bug fix
  • 🌟 New feature
  • 🔨 Breaking change
  • 📖 Refactoring / dependency upgrade / documentation
  • other:

Packages affected

  • @clerk/clerk-js
  • @clerk/clerk-react
  • @clerk/nextjs
  • @clerk/remix
  • @clerk/types
  • @clerk/themes
  • @clerk/localizations
  • @clerk/clerk-expo
  • @clerk/backend
  • @clerk/clerk-sdk-node
  • @clerk/shared
  • @clerk/fastify
  • @clerk/chrome-extension
  • gatsby-plugin-clerk
  • build/tooling/chore

@desiprisg
desiprisg requested a review from a team as a code owner October 11, 2023 09:03
@changeset-bot

changeset-bot Bot commented Oct 11, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 94daab2

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 3 packages
Name Type
@clerk/clerk-js Minor
@clerk/chrome-extension Patch
@clerk/clerk-expo Patch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

const onlyPhoneNumberInitialValueExists =
!!ctx.initialValues?.phoneNumber && !(ctx.initialValues.emailAddress || ctx.initialValues.username);
const shouldStartWithPhoneNumberIdentifier =
!!onlyPhoneNumberInitialValueExists && identifierAttributes.includes('phone_number');

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
!!onlyPhoneNumberInitialValueExists && identifierAttributes.includes('phone_number');
onlyPhoneNumberInitialValueExists && identifierAttributes.includes('phone_number');

@desiprisg
desiprisg force-pushed the george/usr-405-autoswitch-to-phone-number-input-on-sign-in-start-if-just branch from ceb59ac to 636b9cc Compare October 12, 2023 01:46
@desiprisg
desiprisg force-pushed the george/usr-405-autoswitch-to-phone-number-input-on-sign-in-start-if-just branch from 29bed70 to 94daab2 Compare October 12, 2023 01:56
@desiprisg
desiprisg enabled auto-merge October 12, 2023 01:56
@desiprisg
desiprisg added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 12, 2023
Merged via the queue into main with commit c04ad94 Oct 12, 2023
@desiprisg
desiprisg deleted the george/usr-405-autoswitch-to-phone-number-input-on-sign-in-start-if-just branch October 12, 2023 02:12
@clerk-cookie clerk-cookie mentioned this pull request Oct 12, 2023
onlyPhoneNumberInitialValueExists && identifierAttributes.includes('phone_number');
const [identifierAttribute, setIdentifierAttribute] = useState<SignInStartIdentifier>(
shouldStartWithPhoneNumberIdentifier ? 'phone_number' : identifierAttributes[0] || '',
);

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🙃 instead of using phone_number hard coded string, could we use PhoneNumberIdentifier from @clerk/types?

@clerk-cookie

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

This PR has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs.

@clerk clerk locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 12, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants