-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 460
fix(clerk-js): apply the Safari ITP cookie refresh on sign-out #9254
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
dmoerner
wants to merge
1
commit into
main
Choose a base branch
from
daniel/user-5769-safari-itp-sign-out-cookie-refresh
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+75
−1
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ | ||
| --- | ||
| '@clerk/clerk-js': patch | ||
| --- | ||
|
|
||
| Apply the Safari ITP cookie refresh on sign-out. | ||
|
|
||
| Signing out re-issues the client cookie from a fetch, which Safari's ITP caps at 7 days. The client outlives sign-out, and it is what Client Trust uses to recognize a known device, so the cap meant a user who signed out and came back more than a week later was treated as being on a new device and challenged for a second factor. | ||
|
|
||
| `signOut()` now routes its redirect through `/v1/client/touch` when the client cookie is close to expiring, the same workaround `setActive()` already applies after sign-in. The redirect is left unchanged when no refresh is needed. | ||
|
|
||
| This covers `signOut()` calls that navigate to a redirect URL, including `<UserButton />` and `<SignOutButton />`. Passing your own callback to `signOut(callback)` still navigates on your behalf and is not decorated. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🎯 Functional Correctness | 🟡 Minor | ⚡ Quick win
Encode nested redirect URLs in the test mock.
The mock interpolates
redirectUrl.toString()directly into the query, unlikeClient.buildTouchUrl(). A destination containing?or&would be parsed incorrectly, so this test does not cover the redirect-preservation contract.Suggested test adjustment
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents