Skip to content

Replace review-code-examples agent with code-review skill#28268

Merged
elithrar merged 2 commits into
productionfrom
supersede-review-code-examples
Feb 20, 2026
Merged

Replace review-code-examples agent with code-review skill#28268
elithrar merged 2 commits into
productionfrom
supersede-review-code-examples

Conversation

@elithrar

@elithrar elithrar commented Feb 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

The .opencode/agent/review-code-examples.md inline agent is now superseded by the .agents/skills/code-review/ skill added in #28267.

  • Delete .opencode/agent/review-code-examples.md (99 lines of inline review rules)
  • Update .opencode/command/review-code-examples.md to load the code-review skill instead of delegating to the deleted agent
  • The command retains the editing discipline rules (copy-then-modify, verify indentation) since those are specific to the command workflow, not the skill's domain knowledge

Users still invoke /review-code-examples locally (if they wish), but agents will automatically use the skill when in the cloudflare-docs repo and are asked for a review.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This pull request requires reviews from CODEOWNERS as it changes files that match the following patterns:

Pattern Owners
* @cloudflare/pcx-technical-writing

@elithrar elithrar self-assigned this Feb 11, 2026
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@elithrar
elithrar marked this pull request as ready for review February 12, 2026 23:56
@elithrar
elithrar requested a review from a team February 12, 2026 23:56
@elithrar
elithrar enabled auto-merge (squash) February 12, 2026 23:56
@elithrar
elithrar merged commit 6374c31 into production Feb 20, 2026
9 checks passed
@elithrar
elithrar deleted the supersede-review-code-examples branch February 20, 2026 15:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants