Skip to content

Databricks sdk protobuf#1128

Merged
conda-forge-admin merged 3 commits intoconda-forge:mainfrom
claytonparnell:databricks-sdk-protobuf
Dec 17, 2025
Merged

Databricks sdk protobuf#1128
conda-forge-admin merged 3 commits intoconda-forge:mainfrom
claytonparnell:databricks-sdk-protobuf

Conversation

@claytonparnell
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@claytonparnell claytonparnell commented Dec 16, 2025

Checklist

  • Used a static YAML file for the patch if possible (instructions).
  • Only wrote code directly into generate_patch_json.py if absolutely necessary.
  • Ran pre-commit run -a and ensured all files pass the linting checks.
  • Ran python show_diff.py and posted the output as part of the PR.
  • Modifications won't affect packages built in the future.

We've updated the databricks-sdk-feedstock (conda-forge/databricks-sdk-feedstock#96), but the previous build is still being picked up causing issues; thus opening this PR to patch just the previous 0.74.0 build (databricks-sdk-0.74.0-pyhd8ed1ab_0)

python recipe/show_diff.py                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
================================================================================
================================================================================
linux-armv7l
================================================================================
================================================================================
win-32
================================================================================
================================================================================
linux-ppc64le
================================================================================
================================================================================
osx-arm64
================================================================================
================================================================================
linux-aarch64
================================================================================
================================================================================
noarch
noarch::databricks-sdk-0.74.0-pyhd8ed1ab_0.conda
-    "protobuf",
+    "protobuf >=4.25.8,!=5.26.*,!=5.27.*,!=5.28.*,!=5.29.0,!=5.29.1,!=5.29.2,!=5.29.3,!=5.29.4,!=6.30.0,!=6.30.1,!=6.31.0,<7.0",
================================================================================
================================================================================
win-64
================================================================================
================================================================================
osx-64
================================================================================
================================================================================
linux-64

@claytonparnell claytonparnell requested a review from a team as a code owner December 16, 2025 23:50
@conda-forge-admin
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe/meta.yaml) and found it was in an excellent condition.

@hmaarrfk hmaarrfk added the automerge Merge the PR when CI passes label Dec 17, 2025
@conda-forge-admin conda-forge-admin merged commit 5d4fc8a into conda-forge:main Dec 17, 2025
3 checks passed
@conda-forge-admin
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Hi! This is the friendly conda-forge automerge bot!

I considered the following status checks when analyzing this PR:

  • linter: passed
  • github-actions: passed

Thus the PR was passing and merged! Have a great day!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

automerge Merge the PR when CI passes

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants