Rebuild for python 3.13#139
Conversation
…nda-forge-pinning 2024.11.23.20.32.37
|
Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service. I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR ( I do have some suggestions for making it better though... For recipe/meta.yaml:
This message was generated by GitHub Actions workflow run https://github.com/conda-forge/conda-forge-webservices/actions/runs/11993610394. Examine the logs at this URL for more detail. |
|
Already done in #133. |
|
Actually, let's use this to revert 1a16682, which was necessary to unblock the bot, see regro/cf-scripts#3198 |
This reverts commit 1a16682.
95d117f to
eb12c41
Compare
h-vetinari
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Funny... Since we've been on cos7 images, we've never actually gotten newer c-ares builds (post conda-forge/c-ares-feedstock#38) until now.
ImportError: The pyarrow installation is not built with support for 'flight' (/lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.25' not found (required by /home/conda/feedstock_root/build_artifacts/apache-arrow_1732427745677/_test_env_placehold_placehold_placehold_placehold_placehold_placehold_placehold_placehold_placehold_placehold_placehold_placehold_placehold_placehold_placehold_placehold_placehold_pla/lib/python3.10/site-packages/pyarrow/../../../././libcares.so.2))
| docker_image: | ||
| - quay.io/condaforge/linux-anvil-cuda:11.8 | ||
| - quay.io/condaforge/linux-anvil-x86_64-cuda11.8:ubi8 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
But more importantly, those images do have a new enough glibc
virtual packages : __archspec=1=x86_64_v4
__conda=24.9.2=0
__cuda=11.8=0
__glibc=2.28=0
__linux=6.5.0=0
__unix=0=0
so that error makes no sense to me.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
What was the resolution here?
Was it just rebuilding the dependency on GLIBC 2.17 ( conda-forge/c-ares-feedstock#43 )?
Or is there still something that needs follow up? If so, happy to chat in a new issue with current details :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Was it just rebuilding the dependency on GLIBC 2.17
Yes.
|
Hi! This is the friendly conda-forge automerge bot! I considered the following status checks when analyzing this PR:
Thus the PR was passing and merged! Have a great day! |
This PR has been triggered in an effort to update python313.
Notes and instructions for merging this PR:
Please note that if you close this PR we presume that the feedstock has been rebuilt, so if you are going to perform the rebuild yourself don't close this PR until the your rebuild has been merged.
If this PR was opened in error or needs to be updated please add the
bot-rerunlabel to this PR. The bot will close this PR and schedule another one. If you do not have permissions to add this label, you can use the phrase@conda-forge-admin, please rerun botin a PR comment to have theconda-forge-adminadd it for you.This PR was created by the regro-cf-autotick-bot. The regro-cf-autotick-bot is a service to automatically track the dependency graph, migrate packages, and propose package version updates for conda-forge. Feel free to drop us a line if there are any issues! This PR was generated by https://github.com/regro/cf-scripts/actions/runs/11993228092 - please use this URL for debugging.