feat(accounts): use gogoproto API instead of protov2. #18653
feat(accounts): use gogoproto API instead of protov2. #18653testinginprod merged 20 commits intomainfrom
Conversation
WalkthroughWalkthroughThe changes across the codebase reflect a significant shift from using generic protobuf types to more specific or custom types, such as Changes
TipsChat with CodeRabbit Bot (
|
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 6
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files ignored due to filter (6)
- crypto/keys/secp256k1/keys.pb.go
- x/accounts/interfaces/account_abstraction/v1/interface.pb.go
- x/accounts/testing/counter/v1/counter.pb.go
- x/accounts/testing/rotation/v1/partial.pb.go
- x/accounts/v1/query.pb.go
- x/accounts/v1/tx.pb.go
Files selected for processing (35)
- api/cosmos/accounts/v1/query.pulsar.go (27 hunks)
- api/cosmos/accounts/v1/tx.pulsar.go (51 hunks)
- baseapp/internal/protocompat/protocompat.go (3 hunks)
- codec/unknownproto/unknown_fields.go (4 hunks)
- proto/cosmos/accounts/interfaces/account_abstraction/v1/interface.proto (1 hunks)
- proto/cosmos/accounts/testing/counter/v1/counter.proto (1 hunks)
- proto/cosmos/accounts/testing/rotation/v1/partial.proto (1 hunks)
- proto/cosmos/accounts/v1/query.proto (2 hunks)
- proto/cosmos/accounts/v1/tx.proto (3 hunks)
- simapp/app.go (1 hunks)
- tests/e2e/accounts/account_abstraction_test.go (11 hunks)
- x/accounts/account_test.go (4 hunks)
- x/accounts/accountstd/exports.go (3 hunks)
- x/accounts/cli/cli.go (4 hunks)
- x/accounts/genesis_test.go (2 hunks)
- x/accounts/internal/implementation/account_test.go (2 hunks)
- x/accounts/internal/implementation/api_builder.go (8 hunks)
- x/accounts/internal/implementation/api_builder_test.go (2 hunks)
- x/accounts/internal/implementation/context.go (5 hunks)
- x/accounts/internal/implementation/context_test.go (3 hunks)
- x/accounts/internal/implementation/encoding.go (1 hunks)
- x/accounts/internal/implementation/implementation.go (4 hunks)
- x/accounts/internal/implementation/implementation_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/accounts/internal/implementation/protoaccount.go (2 hunks)
- x/accounts/keeper.go (11 hunks)
- x/accounts/keeper_account_abstraction.go (10 hunks)
- x/accounts/keeper_test.go (5 hunks)
- x/accounts/msg_server.go (6 hunks)
- x/accounts/msg_server_test.go (2 hunks)
- x/accounts/query_server.go (3 hunks)
- x/accounts/query_server_test.go (2 hunks)
- x/accounts/testing/account_abstraction/full.go (1 hunks)
- x/accounts/testing/account_abstraction/minimal.go (1 hunks)
- x/accounts/testing/counter/counter.go (1 hunks)
- x/accounts/utils_test.go (2 hunks)
Files not summarized due to errors (2)
- api/cosmos/accounts/v1/query.pulsar.go: Error: Message exceeds token limit
- api/cosmos/accounts/v1/tx.pulsar.go: Error: Message exceeds token limit
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
- proto/cosmos/accounts/interfaces/account_abstraction/v1/interface.proto
- proto/cosmos/accounts/testing/counter/v1/counter.proto
- proto/cosmos/accounts/testing/rotation/v1/partial.proto
Additional comments: 146
api/cosmos/accounts/v1/query.pulsar.go (8)
3424-3427: The
AccountQueryRequestmessage type correctly defines atargetfield of typestringand arequestfield of typegoogle.protobuf.Any. This allows for a flexible request that can contain any type of message.3468-3471: The
AccountQueryResponsemessage type correctly defines aresponsefield of typegoogle.protobuf.Any. This allows for a flexible response that can contain any type of message.3718-3728: The
SchemaRequestmessage type correctly defines anaccount_typefield of typestring. This field is intended to specify the account type for which the schema is being requested.3736-3753: The
SchemaResponsemessage type correctly definesinit_schema,execute_handlers, andquery_handlersfields, each designed to hold schema descriptors for different account methods. The use of repeated fields forexecute_handlersandquery_handlersallows for multiple handlers to be defined.3753-3756: The
SchemaResponse_Handlermessage type correctly definesrequestandresponsefields of typestring. These fields are intended to hold the names that can be used to look up the reflection descriptor.3757-3760: The
AccountTypeRequestmessage type correctly defines anaddressfield of typestring. This field is intended to specify the address for which the account type is being requested.3761-3764: The
AccountTypeResponsemessage type correctly defines anaccount_typefield of typestring. This field is intended to specify the account type associated with the address provided in the request.3764-3794: The service definition
Querycorrectly defines RPC methodsAccountQuery,Schema, andAccountType, each with appropriate request and response types. These methods correspond to the message types defined above and provide the necessary functionality for querying account information.api/cosmos/accounts/v1/tx.pulsar.go (6)
3149-3154: The
MsgInitmessage correctly defines thesender,account_type, andmessagefields with appropriate protobuf field tags.3203-3206: The
MsgInitResponsemessage correctly defines theaccount_addressandresponsefields with appropriate protobuf field tags.3250-3254: The
MsgExecutemessage correctly defines thesender,target, andmessagefields with appropriate protobuf field tags.3304-3305: The
MsgExecuteResponsemessage correctly defines theresponsefield with appropriate protobuf field tags.3250-3254: The
MsgExecuteBundlemessage correctly defines thebundlerandoperationsfields with appropriate protobuf field tags.3203-3206: The
MsgExecuteBundleResponsemessage correctly defines theresponsesfield with appropriate protobuf field tags.baseapp/internal/protocompat/protocompat.go (4)
9-9: The summary states that
gogoproto.Mergeis replaced withproto.Mergefrom thegithub.com/golang/protobuf/protopackage, which is not part of theprotov2API. Please verify that this aligns with the PR objective to standardize onprotov2APIs.129-130: The comments explain that
gogoproto.Mergedoes not work consistently, which is whyproto.Mergeis used. This context is important for understanding the rationale behind the changes.126-143: The
makeGogoHybridHandlerfunction is designed to handlegogoprotomessages, which may be necessary for backward compatibility or gradual migration toprotov2. Ensure that this is in line with the overall migration strategy.6-12: The import of
github.com/golang/protobuf/protois marked with anolintcomment to bypass static analysis checks. This is necessary becausegogoproto.Mergedoes not work consistently, andproto.Mergeis used as a workaround. Ensure that this exception to linting rules is acceptable within the project's coding standards.codec/unknownproto/unknown_fields.go (3)
44-50: The summary states that the function
RejectUnknownFieldshas been modified to accept only two parameters, but the hunk shows that it still accepts four parameters. This discrepancy should be clarified.341-350: The summary states that the function
extractFileDescMessageDescnow takes a single parameter, but the hunk shows that it still takes a parameter of typeproto.Messageand returns two additional types. This discrepancy should be clarified.390-397: > Note: This review was outside the patches, so it was mapped to the patch with the greatest overlap. Original lines [390-409]
The function
getDescriptorInfocorrectly matches the summary, accepting a single parameter of typeproto.Message.proto/cosmos/accounts/v1/query.proto (4)
5-5: The
go_packageoption has been updated to reflect the new package path for the Go code generated from the.protofiles.7-7: The import statement for "google/protobuf/any.proto" has been added, which is necessary for using the
google.protobuf.Anytype in the proto messages.24-24: The
requestfield inAccountQueryRequesthas been correctly changed frombytestogoogle.protobuf.Any, allowing for more structured data to be used in the request.30-30: The
responsefield inAccountQueryResponsehas been correctly changed frombytestogoogle.protobuf.Any, which is consistent with the change in the request and allows for more structured data in the response.proto/cosmos/accounts/v1/tx.proto (5)
4-9: The addition of
google/protobuf/any.protoimport and the update of the Go package path are consistent with the PR's objective to standardize the usage ofproto.Mergeand to use more structured message types.31-35: The replacement of
bytesfields withgoogle.protobuf.Anyin theMsgInitmessage definition aligns with the PR's objective to improve message structure and encoding/decoding logic.39-43: The replacement of
bytesfields withgoogle.protobuf.Anyin theMsgInitResponsemessage definition aligns with the PR's objective to improve message structure and encoding/decoding logic.50-54: The replacement of
bytesfields withgoogle.protobuf.Anyin theMsgExecutemessage definition aligns with the PR's objective to improve message structure and encoding/decoding logic.58-60: The replacement of
bytesfields withgoogle.protobuf.Anyin theMsgExecuteResponsemessage definition aligns with the PR's objective to improve message structure and encoding/decoding logic.simapp/app.go (1)
- 287-293: Please ensure that the PR checklist items, such as adding a changelog entry, updating documentation, and confirming CI checks, are completed before finalizing the PR.
tests/e2e/accounts/account_abstraction_test.go (5)
6-22: The changes in import paths align with the PR objectives to transition from
gogoprototoprotov2APIs and reflect a reorganization of the codebase.318-326: The
intoAnyfunction signature has been correctly updated to usecodectypes.Anyinstead ofanypb.Any, aligning with the PR objectives.328-332: The
coinsfunction signature has been correctly updated to returnsdk.Coinsinstead ofv1beta1.Coin, aligning with the PR objectives.70-74: The usage of
intoAnyfunction in the test cases is consistent with the updated function signature and the PR objectives.Also applies to: 76-79, 103-107, 109-112, 130-134, 136-139, 159-163, 165-168, 189-193, 195-198, 218-222, 224-227, 247-251, 253-256, 273-276, 300-305, 307-310
- 73-73: The usage of
coinsfunction in the test cases is consistent with the updated function signature and the PR objectives.Also applies to: 78-78, 106-106, 111-111, 133-133, 138-138, 192-192, 197-197, 221-221, 226-226, 250-250, 255-255, 276-276, 304-304, 309-309
x/accounts/account_test.go (7)
4-10: The import changes from
google.golang.org/protobuftogithub.com/cosmos/gogoprototypes are consistent with the PR's objective to standardize the usage ofproto.Mergefor message merging.29-35: The usage of
types.Emptyfromgithub.com/cosmos/gogoprotoinstead ofemptypb.Emptyis in line with the PR's goal to replacegogoprotoAPI withprotov2API.44-50: The replacement of
wrapperspb.StringValuewithtypes.StringValueand the subsequent usage oftypes.UInt64Valueis consistent with the PR's objective.26-57: > Note: This review was outside the patches, so it was mapped to the patch with the greatest overlap. Original lines [54-72]
The replacement of
wrapperspb.Int64Valuewithtypes.Int64Valueand the use oftypes.Emptyin the error handling logic align with the PR's objective.
86-88: The replacement of
wrapperspb.UInt64Valuewithtypes.UInt64Valueandwrapperspb.StringValuewithtypes.StringValueis consistent with the PR's objective.92-95: The replacement of
wrapperspb.StringValuewithtypes.StringValueand the subsequent usage oftypes.Int64Valueis consistent with the PR's objective.110-116: The use of
types.DoubleValueandtypes.UInt64Valueis consistent with the PR's objective to replacegogoprotoAPI withprotov2API.x/accounts/accountstd/exports.go (4)
6-11: The removal of
gogoprotoimports and the transition toprotov2APIs is not directly visible in the provided hunks, but the changes in function signatures fromimplementation.ProtoMsg[Type]toimplementation.ProtoMsgG[Type]are consistent with the PR's objective to standardize protobuf message handling.32-63: The changes in function signatures to use
implementation.ProtoMsgG[Type]instead ofimplementation.ProtoMsg[Type]and the modification of theAddAccountfunction's return type are in line with the PR's objective to improve protobuf message handling. Ensure that all calls to these functions are updated to match the new signatures.78-102: The changes in function signatures for
ExecModule,QueryModule,UnpackAny, andPackAnyto useimplementation.ProtoMsgGandimplementation.Anyinstead ofproto.Messageandanypb.Anyrespectively, are consistent with the PR's objective. Ensure that all calls to these functions are updated to match the new signatures.104-111: The
ExecModuleAnysfunction signature change to useimplementation.Anyinstead ofanypb.Anyis consistent with the PR's objective. Ensure that all calls to this function are updated to match the new signature.x/accounts/cli/cli.go (4)
3-16: The import section has been updated to reflect the transition from
gogoprototoprotov2API, which aligns with the PR objectives.138-141: The
GetQueryAccountCmdfunction now usesclientCtx.PrintProto(res)for output, which is a change consistent with the PR objectives to standardize protobuf message handling.161-164: The
handlerMsgBytesfunction signature has been updated to return*codectypes.Any, which aligns with the PR objectives to useproto.Mergefor message merging.175-185: The
encodeJSONToProtofunction has been updated to usecodectypesandgogoprotopackages for message handling and encoding, which is in line with the PR objectives.x/accounts/genesis_test.go (2)
15-32: The updates to the
newKeeperfunction signature and the usage oftypes.Empty{}andtypes.UInt64Value{}from thegithub.com/cosmos/gogoproto/typespackage align with the PR's objective to standardize protobuf message handling.43-51: The updates to the
k.Querycalls and the assertions in the test cases are consistent with the PR's objective to transition fromgoogle.golang.org/protobuf/types/knowntogithub.com/cosmos/gogoproto/types.x/accounts/internal/implementation/account_test.go (2)
3-9: The changes in the import statements are consistent with the PR's objective to replace
gogoprotoAPI withprotov2API.27-55: The function signatures and type usages in this hunk are updated to use types from
github.com/cosmos/gogoproto/types, which aligns with the PR's objective and the summary provided.x/accounts/internal/implementation/api_builder.go (8)
22-25: The change from
anytoProtoMsgin thehandlerfunction signature enhances type safety and clarity, aligning with the PR's objective to standardize protocol buffer message handling.33-36: The error handling for the absence of an
inithandler is clear and follows Go's idiomatic approach of returning an error when a function cannot proceed due to missing prerequisites.42-45: The initialization of
handlersandhandlersSchemamaps with the correct types forProtoMsgis consistent with the changes made in theInitBuilderand aligns with the PR's goal of improving type safety.52-55: The update to the
handlersmap to useProtoMsginstead ofanyis consistent with the changes in theInitBuilderand is a good practice for type safety and clarity.62-68: The error handling for the case where no execution handlers are registered is appropriate, and the use of a default handler that returns
errNoExecuteHandleris a good way to provide clear feedback to the caller.75-79: The dynamic dispatch logic to find and call the appropriate handler based on the message name is well-implemented, and the error handling for unregistered messages is clear and informative.
87-87: The
QueryBuilderinitialization usingNewExecuteBuildersuggests that the query and execution handlers share the same API, which is a good design choice for consistency and maintainability.99-101: The delegation of
makeHandlerinQueryBuildertoExecuteBuilder'smakeHandleris a good example of code reuse and helps to maintain consistency between execution and query handling.x/accounts/internal/implementation/api_builder_test.go (1)
- 4-17: > Note: This review was outside the patches, so it was mapped to the patch with the greatest overlap. Original lines [4-34]
The changes from
wrapperspb.StringValuetotypes.StringValuein the function signatures and test statements are consistent with the PR's objective to transition fromgogoprototoprotov2APIs.x/accounts/internal/implementation/context_test.go (4)
4-11: The import changes are consistent with the PR objectives to transition from
gogoprototoprotov2APIs.27-34: The replacement of
NewImplementationwithnewImplementationand the change in argument type for theExecutefunction align with the PR objectives.43-43: The hardcoded byte array in the assertion should be verified to ensure it reflects the expected outcome after the refactoring.
46-77: The changes in argument types for
ExecModule,ExecModuleUntyped,QueryModule, andMergefunctions are consistent with the PR objectives.x/accounts/internal/implementation/encoding.go (6)
- 8-8: The import statement
github.com/cosmos/gogoproto/protoseems to contradict the PR's objective to replacegogoprotowithprotov2. Please verify if this is intentional or an oversight.
The import statement
github.com/cosmos/gogoproto/protois consistently used across various files in the codebase, indicating that the usage inx/accounts/internal/implementation/encoding.gois likely intentional and aligned with the current codebase structure.
15-21: The implementation of
FindMessageByNamecorrectly uses reflection to instantiate message types by name, which aligns with the PR's objective to improve message handling.33-36: The use of generics in
UnpackAnyis a modern Go feature and should be fine as long as the codebase is using Go 1.18 or later.38-40: The use of
proto.UnmarshalinUnpackAnyTois consistent with the PR's objective to standardize onprotomessage handling.53-55: The
Mergefunction correctly usesproto.Merge, aligning with the PR's objective to replacegogoproto.Merge.57-59: The
Equalfunction correctly usesproto.Equal, aligning with the PR's objective to standardize onprotomessage handling.x/accounts/internal/implementation/implementation.go (6)
18-18: The signature change for
AccountCreatorFuncis correct and aligns with the PR objectives to standardize the usage ofproto.Mergefor message merging.47-47: The renaming of
NewImplementationtonewImplementationis correct and aligns with the PR objectives.27-41: The changes within
MakeAccountsMapfunction, including the use ofnewImplementationand the variableaccountInterface, are correct and align with the PR objectives.69-100: > Note: This review was outside the patches, so it was mapped to the patch with the greatest overlap. Original lines [89-105]
The structural changes to the
Implementationstruct, including the addition of new schema fields, are correct and align with the PR objectives.
73-86: The logic changes in the
newImplementationfunction, including the schema building and assignment to theCollectionsSchemafield, are correct and align with the PR objectives.93-97: The parameter changes in the
Init,Execute, andQueryfunctions of theImplementationstruct to useProtoMsgare correct and align with the PR objectives.x/accounts/internal/implementation/implementation_test.go (3)
4-11: The import statements have been updated to reflect the transition from
gogoprototoprotov2APIs, aligning with the PR objectives.14-14: The function
newImplementationis correctly called with the additional argumentcollections.NewSchemaBuilderFromAccessor(OpenKVStore), which is consistent with the summary.13-58: The test cases are using the updated
typesfromgithub.com/cosmos/gogoproto/typesand seem to be correctly implemented with no apparent issues.x/accounts/internal/implementation/protoaccount.go (7)
11-11: The summary incorrectly states that the
ProtoMsginterface is replaced withprotoiface.MessageV1. The code shows thatProtoMsgis defined as an alias toprotoiface.MessageV1, not replaced.13-17: The introduction of the generic interface
ProtoMsgGis correctly reflected in the code.4-29: > Note: This review was outside the patches, so it was mapped to the patch with the greatest overlap. Original lines [19-30]
The update to the
RegisterInitHandlerfunction signature to use the new generic interfaceProtoMsgGis consistent with the summary.
74-84: The
NewProtoMessageSchemafunction is updated to handle the new generic interfaceProtoMsgG, which is consistent with the summary.40-64: The
RegisterExecuteHandlerfunction is updated to use the new generic interfaceProtoMsgG. This change is part of the protobuf message handling improvements and is consistent with the overall PR objectives.66-72: The
RegisterQueryHandlerfunction delegates toRegisterExecuteHandler, which is updated to use the new generic interfaceProtoMsgG. This is consistent with the changes made in the PR.74-84: The
NewProtoMessageSchemafunction includes error handling that panics if aprotov2message is used, which aligns with the PR's objective to move away fromgogoprotoand standardize onproto.Merge.x/accounts/keeper.go (14)
11-12: The import statements for
gogoprotoandprotoare present, which is consistent with the PR's objective to transition fromgogoprototoprotov2APIs.39-42: The
QueryRouterinterface has been updated to useimplementation.ProtoMsginstead ofprotoiface.MessageV1, which aligns with the PR's objective to standardize message handling.54-54: The
SignerProviderinterface methodGetMsgV1Signersnow usesgogoproto.Messageinstead ofproto.Message. This change should be verified across the codebase to ensure that all implementations of this interface and calls to this method are updated accordingly.
The verification of the
SignerProviderinterface methodGetMsgV1Signersconfirms that the method signature has been updated to usegogoproto.Messageacross various files in the codebase. Implementations and calls to this method have been found inx/group/keeper/proposal_executor.go,x/gov/keeper/proposal.go,x/authz/keeper/keeper.go,x/accounts/utils_test.go,x/accounts/keeper.go,codec/proto_codec_test.go,codec/proto_codec.go, andcodec/codec.go. TheCHANGELOG.mdalso reflects the introduction of new methods includingGetMsgV1Signers.
60-62: The
InterfaceRegistryinterface is introduced with methods for registering interfaces and implementations, which is a new addition mentioned in the summary.70-76: > Note: This review was outside the patches, so it was mapped to the patch with the greatest overlap. Original lines [65-75]
The
NewKeeperfunction signature has been updated to include anInterfaceRegistryparameter, which is consistent with the changes described in the summary.
101-101: The
registerToInterfaceRegistryfunction is called withinNewKeeperto register interfaces and implementations, which is a new function mentioned in the summary.135-139: The
Initmethod of theKeepertype has been updated to accept a parameter of typeimplementation.ProtoMsginstead ofany, which aligns with the PR's objective to use specific types for message handling.177-181: The
Executemethod of theKeepertype has been updated to accept a parameter of typeimplementation.ProtoMsginstead ofany, which is consistent with the PR's objective.203-207: The
Querymethod of theKeepertype has been updated to accept a parameter of typeimplementation.ProtoMsginstead ofany, which is consistent with the PR's objective.261-270: The
makeAccountContextfunction has been updated to useimplementation.ProtoMsgand includes error handling for execution in a query context, which is consistent with the PR's objective to standardize message handling.297-311: The
sendModuleMessageUntypedfunction has been updated to useimplementation.ProtoMsgand includes logic to fetch the response type from the request message type, which is consistent with the PR's objective.326-377: > Note: This review was outside the patches, so it was mapped to the patch with the greatest overlap. Original lines [317-334]
The
sendModuleMessagefunction includes sender verification and message routing logic, which is consistent with the PR's objective to standardize message handling.
337-349: The
queryModulefunction includes logic to handle query routing and execution, which is consistent with the PR's objective to standardize message handling.359-377: The
registerToInterfaceRegistryfunction registers interfaces and implementations to the global interface registry, which is a new addition mentioned in the summary and aligns with the PR's objective.x/accounts/keeper_account_abstraction.go (10)
5-11: The changes in package imports and type references align with the PR's objective to transition from
gogoprototoprotov2APIs.23-31: The update to the
ExecuteUserOperationfunction signature to usev1.UserOperationis consistent with the PR's objective to standardize the usage ofproto.Merge.64-70: The update to the
Authenticatefunction signature to usev1.UserOperationis consistent with the PR's objective to standardize the usage ofproto.Merge.80-85: The update to the
authenticatefunction signature to usev1.UserOperationis consistent with the PR's objective to standardize the usage ofproto.Merge.104-111: The update to the
OpExecuteMessagesfunction signature to useimplementation.Anyis consistent with the PR's objective to standardize the usage ofproto.Merge.120-127: The update to the
opExecuteMessagesfunction signature to useimplementation.Anyis consistent with the PR's objective to standardize the usage ofproto.Merge.157-164: The update to the
PayBundlerfunction signature to useimplementation.Anyis consistent with the PR's objective to standardize the usage ofproto.Merge.173-180: The update to the
payBundlerfunction signature to useimplementation.Anyis consistent with the PR's objective to standardize the usage ofproto.Merge.208-213: The update to the
parsePayBundlerResponsefunction to useimplementation.Anyis consistent with the PR's objective to standardize the usage ofproto.Merge.222-227: The update to the
parseExecuteResponsefunction to useimplementation.Anyis consistent with the PR's objective to standardize the usage ofproto.Merge.x/accounts/keeper_test.go (7)
7-15: The import statements have been updated to reflect the transition from
gogoprototoprotov2APIs, which is consistent with the PR objectives and summaries.18-23: The
TestKeeper_Initfunction correctly uses the newtypes.Emptytype in place ofemptypb.Empty, aligning with the PR's goal to standardize protobuf message handling.28-34: The
oktest case withinTestKeeper_Initcorrectly usestypes.Emptyin line with the PR's objective to replaceemptypb.Empty.53-65: The
oktest case withinTestKeeper_Executecorrectly usestypes.Empty, which is consistent with the PR's objective to replaceemptypb.Empty.94-108: The
oktest case withinTestKeeper_Querycorrectly usestypes.Empty, aligning with the PR's objective to replaceemptypb.Empty.125-136: > Note: This review was outside the patches, so it was mapped to the patch with the greatest overlap. Original lines [116-134]
The
query moduletest case withinTestKeeper_Querycorrectly usestypes.StringValueandtypes.Int64Value, which is consistent with the PR's objective to replacewrapperspb.Stringandwrapperspb.Int64.
- 128-128: The use of
proto.Mergein thequery moduletest case is consistent with the PR's objective to standardize message merging usingproto.Merge.x/accounts/msg_server.go (5)
7-12: The addition of the new import statement for
"cosmossdk.io/x/accounts/internal/implementation"aligns with the PR's objective to replacegogoprotowithprotov2API usage.31-34: The replacement of
impl.InitHandlerSchema.RequestSchema.TxDecodewithimplementation.UnpackAnyRawis consistent with the PR's objective to standardize message handling usingprotov2APIs.61-68: The replacement of
impl.InitHandlerSchema.ResponseSchema.TxEncodewithimplementation.PackAnyis consistent with the PR's objective to standardize message handling usingprotov2APIs.84-87: The replacement of
impl.DecodeExecuteRequestwithimplementation.UnpackAnyRawis consistent with the PR's objective to standardize message handling usingprotov2APIs.96-102: The replacement of
impl.EncodeExecuteResponsewithimplementation.PackAnyis consistent with the PR's objective to standardize message handling usingprotov2APIs.x/accounts/msg_server_test.go (6)
6-16: The summary indicates that the import
"google.golang.org/protobuf/types/known/anypb"was removed, but this change is not reflected in the provided hunks. If this import is no longer used in the file, the removal is correct. Otherwise, ensure that the import is necessary for the current implementation.6-16: The addition of the import
"cosmossdk.io/x/accounts/internal/implementation"is consistent with the changes in the code whereimplementation.PackAnyis used.20-20: The change in the type of the
respparameter fromproto.Messagetoimplementation.ProtoMsgis consistent with the PR's objective to standardize the usage ofproto.Mergeand related protobuf handling.23-23: The type assertion for
resphas been correctly updated to(proto.Message)to match the new parameter typeimplementation.ProtoMsg.30-30: The replacement of
proto.Marshalwithimplementation.PackAnyfor theinitMsgvariable aligns with the PR's objective to transition fromgogoprototoprotov2APIs.45-45: The replacement of
proto.Marshalwithimplementation.PackAnyfor theexecuteMsgvariable aligns with the PR's objective to transition fromgogoprototoprotov2APIs.x/accounts/query_server.go (3)
7-9: The addition of the import path
"cosmossdk.io/x/accounts/internal/implementation"aligns with the PR's objective to transition fromgogoprototoprotov2APIs.28-32: The replacement of
impl.DecodeQueryRequestwithimplementation.UnpackAnyRawis consistent with the PR's objective to standardize the usage ofproto.Mergefor message merging.39-47: The replacement of
impl.EncodeQueryResponsewithimplementation.PackAnyis consistent with the PR's objective to standardize the usage ofproto.Mergefor message merging.x/accounts/query_server_test.go (1)
- 4-30: > Note: This review was outside the patches, so it was mapped to the patch with the greatest overlap. Original lines [4-51]
The changes in the
x/accounts/query_server_test.gofile are consistent with the PR objectives and the AI-generated summaries. The code correctly reflects the transition fromgogoprototoprotov2APIs, with appropriate replacements ofproto.Messagewithimplementation.ProtoMsg, and the use ofimplementation.PackAnyandimplementation.UnpackAnyRawfor message handling. The import ofgithub.com/cosmos/gogoproto/typesand the use oftypes.StringValueare also in line with the described changes.x/accounts/testing/account_abstraction/full.go (2)
7-8: The change in the import path from
"cosmossdk.io/api/cosmos/accounts/interfaces/account_abstraction/v1"to"cosmossdk.io/x/accounts/interfaces/account_abstraction/v1"is consistent with the PR objectives and the summary provided.4-9: No further issues or changes are detected in the provided hunks.
x/accounts/testing/account_abstraction/minimal.go (1)
- 7-11: The changes in import paths are consistent with the PR objectives and the summary provided.
x/accounts/testing/counter/counter.go (1)
- 5-11: The import path for
counterv1has been updated to reflect the new location of the package. Ensure that all references tocounterv1in this file and any other files that import this package are updated accordingly.
The updated import path for
counterv1is correctly used inx/accounts/testing/counter/counter.goand is also reflected in thego_packageoption in the corresponding.protofile. No further action is required.x/accounts/utils_test.go (6)
7-9: The addition of the
gogoprotoimport is consistent with the PR's objective to standardize the usage ofproto.Mergefor message merging.39-45: The introduction of the
interfaceRegistrytype and its methods aligns with the PR's objective to improve protobuf message handling.47-85: The function signature changes for
newKeeper,mockQuery,mockSigner, andmockExecare consistent with the PR's objective to transition fromgogoprototoprotov2APIs.47-52: The summary indicates a change in the
newKeeperfunction signature, but the hunk shows no change. Please verify if the summary is accurate or if the hunk is missing the intended changes.57-74: The changes to
mockQueryandmockSignermethod signatures are consistent with the PR's objective and the summary provided.79-85: The changes to the
mockExecmethod signature are consistent with the PR's objective and the summary provided.
| runtime.EventService{}, | ||
| runtime.BranchService{}, | ||
| app.AuthKeeper.AddressCodec(), | ||
| appCodec.InterfaceRegistry().SigningContext(), | ||
| appCodec, | ||
| app.MsgServiceRouter(), | ||
| app.GRPCQueryRouter(), | ||
| appCodec.InterfaceRegistry(), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 NOTE
Codebase verification is a beta feature.
The review of the NewSimApp function changes confirms that the removal of SigningContext() and the addition of appCodec.InterfaceRegistry() is consistent with the PR's objectives. However, the SigningContext method is used in various other parts of the codebase. It is important to ensure that these references are updated or handled appropriately to avoid breaking changes.
- Ensure that the removal of
SigningContext()fromappCodec.InterfaceRegistry().SigningContext()inNewSimAppdoes not lead to unresolved references or logic errors in other parts of the codebase whereSigningContextis used.
Analysis chain
The changes in the NewSimApp function reflect the PR's objective to standardize the usage of proto.Merge for message merging. The removal of SigningContext() and the addition of appCodec.InterfaceRegistry() align with the PR's goal to replace gogoproto with protov2 API usage. Ensure that the removal of SigningContext() does not affect any downstream dependencies that might rely on this method.
| func QueryModule[Resp any, RespProto ProtoMsgG[Resp], Req any, ReqProto ProtoMsgG[Req]](ctx context.Context, req ReqProto) (RespProto, error) { | ||
| // we do not need to check the sender in a query because it is not a state transition. | ||
| // we also unwrap the original context. | ||
| v := ctx.Value(contextKey{}).(contextValue) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
And also here, add a type assertion check for safety.
- v := ctx.Value(contextKey{}).(contextValue)
+ v, ok := ctx.Value(contextKey{}).(contextValue)
+ if !ok {
+ // handle the error, perhaps return an error indicating the context was not set up correctly
+ }Committable suggestion
❗ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| v := ctx.Value(contextKey{}).(contextValue) | |
| v, ok := ctx.Value(contextKey{}).(contextValue) | |
| if !ok { | |
| // handle the error, perhaps return an error indicating the context was not set up correctly | |
| } |
| // we can just call the handler after making a copy of the message, for safety reasons. | ||
| resp, err := method.Handler(handler, ctx, func(msg any) error { | ||
| // ref: https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/issues/18003 | ||
| gogoproto.Merge(msg.(gogoproto.Message), m) | ||
| asGogoProto := msg.(gogoproto.Message) | ||
| // NOTE: using gogoproto.Merge will fail for some reason unknown to me, but | ||
| // using proto.Merge with gogo messages seems to work fine. | ||
| proto.Merge(asGogoProto, m) | ||
| return nil | ||
| }, nil) | ||
| if err != nil { | ||
| return err | ||
| } | ||
| // merge on the resp, ref: https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/issues/18003 | ||
| gogoproto.Merge(outResp.(gogoproto.Message), resp.(gogoproto.Message)) | ||
| // NOTE: using gogoproto.Merge will fail for some reason unknown to me, but | ||
| // using proto.Merge with gogo messages seems to work fine. | ||
| proto.Merge(outResp.(gogoproto.Message), resp.(gogoproto.Message)) | ||
| return nil | ||
| default: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The logic for handling message merging in makeGogoHybridHandler is similar to that in makeProtoV2HybridHandler. Consider refactoring to reduce duplication if it aligns with the project's coding standards and practices.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (1)
- CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
Additional comments: 1
CHANGELOG.md (1)
- 87-87: The changelog entry mentions a fix related to
protocompatwhich aligns with the PR's objective to replacegogoprotowithprotov2. However, given the extensive changes described in the PR summary, it would be prudent to verify if there are any API breaking changes that should be documented in the changelog under the "API Breaking Changes" section.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Should we maybe extract this in another PR and backport it to v0.50?
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (1)
- x/accounts/cli/cli.go (4 hunks)
Additional comments: 4
x/accounts/cli/cli.go (4)
3-17: The import statements reflect the continued use of
gogoprotoandcodectypesfrom the Cosmos SDK, which is inconsistent with the PR objective to transition toprotov2APIs. Please verify if this is intentional or if further changes are needed to align with the PR's goal.140-143: The change to use
clientCtx.PrintProto(res)simplifies the output logic and is consistent with the summary provided forx/accounts/cli/cli.go.163-166: The change in the return type of
handlerMsgBytesto*codectypes.Anyis consistent with the summary provided forx/accounts/cli/cli.goand reflects a shift towards usingcodectypesfor message handling.177-187: The implementation of
encodeJSONToProtocontinues to usegogoprotoandjsonpbfor JSON to proto conversion, which is consistent with the summary forx/accounts/cli/cli.gobut may contradict the PR objective to transition toprotov2APIs.
* feat: secp256k1 public key constant time (cosmos#18026) Signed-off-by: bizk <santiago.yanzon1999@gmail.com> * chore: Fixed changelog duplicated items (cosmos#18628) * adr: Un-Ordered Transaction Inclusion (cosmos#18553) Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Aleksandr Bezobchuk <alexanderbez@users.noreply.github.com> * docs: lint ADR-070 (cosmos#18634) * fix(baseapp)!: postHandler should run regardless of result (cosmos#18627) * docs: fix typos in adr-007-specialization-groups.md (cosmos#18635) * chore: alphabetize labels (cosmos#18640) * docs(x/circuit): add note on ante handler (cosmos#18637) Co-authored-by: Aleksandr Bezobchuk <alexanderbez@users.noreply.github.com> * fix: telemetry metric label variable (cosmos#18643) * chore: typos fix (cosmos#18642) * refactor(store/v2): updates from integration (cosmos#18633) * build(deps): Bump actions/setup-go from 4 to 5 (cosmos#18647) Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com> Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: github-actions <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * feat(store/v2): snapshot manager (cosmos#18458) * chore(client/v2): fix typos in the README.md (cosmos#18657) * fix(baseapp): protocompat.go gogoproto.Merge does not work with custom types (cosmos#18654) Co-authored-by: unknown unknown <unknown@unknown> * chore: fix several minor typos (cosmos#18660) * chore(tools/confix/cmd): fix typo in view.go (cosmos#18659) * refactor(x/staking): check duplicate addresses in StakeAuthorization's params (cosmos#18655) * feat(accounts): use gogoproto API instead of protov2. (cosmos#18653) Co-authored-by: unknown unknown <unknown@unknown> Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * fix(store/commitment/iavl): honor tree.Remove error firstly (cosmos#18651) * build(deps): Bump actions/stale from 8 to 9 (cosmos#18656) Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com> Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * chore(docs): fix typos & wording in docs (cosmos#18667) * chore: fix several typos. (cosmos#18666) * feat(telemetry): enable `statsd` and `dogstatsd` telemetry sinks (cosmos#18646) Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Aleksandr Bezobchuk <alexanderbez@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: marbar3778 <marbar3778@yahoo.com> Co-authored-by: Marko <marko@baricevic.me> * feat(store/v2): add SetInitialVersion in SC (cosmos#18665) * feat(client/keys): support display discreetly for `keys add` (cosmos#18663) Co-authored-by: Julien Robert <julien@rbrt.fr> * ci: add misspell action (cosmos#18671) * chore: typos fix by misspell-fixer (cosmos#18683) Co-authored-by: github-merge-queue <github-merge-queue@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Julien Robert <julien@rbrt.fr> * chore: add v0.50.2 changelog to main (cosmos#18682) * build(deps): Bump github.com/jhump/protoreflect from 1.15.3 to 1.15.4 in /tests (cosmos#18678) Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com> Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * refactor(bank): remove .String() calls (cosmos#18175) Co-authored-by: Facundo <facundomedica@gmail.com> * ci: use codespell instead of misspell-fixer (cosmos#18686) Co-authored-by: Marko <marbar3778@yahoo.com> * feat(gov): add proposal types and spam votes (cosmos#18532) * feat(accounts): use account number as state prefix for account state (cosmos#18664) Co-authored-by: unknown unknown <unknown@unknown> * chore: typos fixes by cosmos-sdk bot (cosmos#18689) Co-authored-by: github-merge-queue <github-merge-queue@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Julien Robert <julien@rbrt.fr> Co-authored-by: marbar3778 <marbar3778@yahoo.com> * feat(client/keys): support display discreetly for keys mnemonic (cosmos#18688) * refactor: remove panic usage in keeper methods (cosmos#18636) * ci: rename pr name in misspell job (cosmos#18693) Co-authored-by: Marko <marko@baricevic.me> * build(deps): Bump github.com/pelletier/go-toml/v2 from 2.1.0 to 2.1.1 in /tools/confix (cosmos#18702) Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com> Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: github-actions <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * feat(client/keys): support display discreetly for keys export (cosmos#18684) * feat(x/gov): better gov genesis validation (cosmos#18707) --------- Signed-off-by: bizk <santiago.yanzon1999@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com> Co-authored-by: Carlos Santiago Yanzon <27785807+bizk@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: yihuang <huang@crypto.com> Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Aleksandr Bezobchuk <alexanderbez@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Facundo Medica <14063057+facundomedica@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Akaonetwo <107335783+Akare123@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Marko <marbar3778@yahoo.com> Co-authored-by: Julien Robert <julien@rbrt.fr> Co-authored-by: dreamweaverxyz <153101746+dreamweaverxyz@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Pioua <136521243+dzizazda@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: github-actions <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: cool-developer <51834436+cool-develope@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: leonarddt05 <139609434+leonarddt05@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: testinginprod <98415576+testinginprod@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: unknown unknown <unknown@unknown> Co-authored-by: Sukey <35202440+sukey2008@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: axie <152680487+azukiboy@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Luke Ma <867273263@qq.com> Co-authored-by: Emmanuel T Odeke <emmanuel@orijtech.com> Co-authored-by: 0xn4de <109149873+0xn4de@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: hattizai <150505746+hattizai@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Devon Bear <itsdevbear@berachain.com> Co-authored-by: Marko <marko@baricevic.me> Co-authored-by: Halimao <1065621723@qq.com> Co-authored-by: Cosmos SDK <113218068+github-prbot@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: github-merge-queue <github-merge-queue@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Facundo <facundomedica@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Likhita Polavarapu <78951027+likhita-809@users.noreply.github.com>
4 participants
Description
Closes: #XXXX
Author Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.
I have...
!in the type prefix if API or client breaking changeCHANGELOG.mdReviewers Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.
I have...
Summary by CodeRabbit