Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #5810 +/- ##
=========================================
- Coverage 32.51% 32.3% -0.21%
=========================================
Files 346 353 +7
Lines 39012 39461 +449
=========================================
+ Hits 12684 12749 +65
- Misses 25061 25439 +378
- Partials 1267 1273 +6
|
alessio
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Good start! I'd love some test cases - at least to avoid code coverage to get even lower. Plus, all query commands should all fail if --offline is passed
alexanderbez
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks great @jgimeno! Let's get a branch open against Gaia that tests this out.
Co-Authored-By: Alexander Bezobchuk <alexanderbez@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-Authored-By: Alexander Bezobchuk <alexanderbez@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-Authored-By: Alexander Bezobchuk <alexanderbez@users.noreply.github.com>
…m:cosmos/cosmos-sdk into jonathan/5448-split-generate-only-offline
|
Here is the branch using this changes cosmos/gaia#326 |
|
FTR @jgimeno and I are testing the changes with |
|
Please merge when thorough testing has been performed @alessio. |
…m:cosmos/cosmos-sdk into jonathan/5448-split-generate-only-offline
|
Manual testing passed. We're now investigating into the drop of coverage stats. |
alessio
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Just a minor thing left, otherwise this is good to go
Dismissing review as per #5810 (comment)
Closes: #5448
Description
For contributor use:
docs/) or specification (x/<module>/spec/)godoccomments.Unreleasedsection inCHANGELOG.mdFiles changedin the Github PR explorerFor admin use:
WIP,R4R,docs, etc)