-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 751
feat: Prefix-based routing in IBCv2 Router #8303
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
gjermundgaraba
merged 9 commits into
cosmos:main
from
kulikthebird:tkulik/feat/prefix_based_routing_ibcv2
May 8, 2025
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
434610f
imp: Prefix based routing for IBCv2
f4e49d3
docs: Update docs
717d783
chore: Prohibit registering of overlapping paths
94d58cc
chore: Use a map instead of radix tree
kulikthebird 3135520
Merge branch 'main' into tkulik/feat/prefix_based_routing_ibcv2
AdityaSripal e10e936
chore: Remove type casting
kulikthebird 840d24a
chore: Add an extra check for prefix existence
kulikthebird 4a78d71
chore: Update CHANGELOG
kulikthebird 88a1a70
Merge branch 'main' into tkulik/feat/prefix_based_routing_ibcv2
gjermundgaraba File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Check warning
Code scanning / CodeQL
Iteration over map Warning
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is there any scenario where this could actually cause any problems?
@AdityaSripal?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The issue here as I understand is that order is not deterministic here. So the first match will pass. But this is why we ensure that no two portIDs on the router are prefixes of each other. Thus the first portID to match the prefix check should be the only portID to match the prefix check.
cc: @kulikthebird
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've just realized, that it is possible to add a shorter prefix using
AddRoutemethod i.e.I'll add an additional check and test case for that scenario
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Done